Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Bombshell Interview Sparks Massive Complaints

Complaints have been flooding in to Ofcom regarding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's controversial interview with Oprah Winfrey, reaching a staggering 5,380.

Last week alone, an additional 200 viewers voiced their opposition, bringing the total number of complaints to a new high.

The interview, which aired on ITV on March 8, received the most complaints last week, with 207 registered.

An insider from The Sun described the complaint as a protest against the unethical and unprofessional collaboration between ITV and the program makers, resulting in the airing of a damaging interview without any editorial control, fact-checking, or balance.

This move is seen as contradictory to ITV's usual character and should be addressed accordingly.

Surprisingly, despite airing over three weeks ago, the interview received more complaints than other popular shows such as Ant and Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway, Sky News, This Morning, and Good Morning Britain.

A source revealed that the interview was initially sensational, but its impact quickly diminished.

In fact, it has become a subject of mockery, with many debunking the lies presented during the interview and turning them into memes.

Speculations arose that Meghan Markle had invited Oprah Winfrey to her wedding with the intention of using her as a platform for the interview.

This has led to accusations of her being a scheming traitor, with the focus on her unethical conduct rather than her race.

The insider further criticized CBS and other parties involved, stating that they should have fact-checked Meghan and Harry's claims before airing the interview.

The source expressed disbelief at the intentions behind the interview, stating that it only served to expose the couple as pathetic liars.

The behavior displayed by both Meghan and Harry was deemed disgusting, with Harry showing little regard for his family and Meghan revealing her true thoughts about her own family.

The complaint emphasized the severe personality disorder exhibited by Meghan, calling for balanced and legal action.

The source suggested that Meghan should be institutionalized, her children adopted, and her safety ensured before being returned to her family.

The urgency of addressing this issue was stressed, as pretending otherwise would be a disservice to those suffering from real depression.

An expert on complaints highlighted Meghan's formal complaint to Ofcom regarding Piers Morgan's comments on Good Morning Britain, where he expressed doubts about her allegations.

The expert emphasized the seriousness of the allegations made against the monarchy, the British royal family, royal staff and aides, and the UK press during the interview.

These allegations were presented without challenge, questioning, proof, evidence, fact-checking, or the right to reply for those affected, violating official Ofcom guidelines on avoiding unjust or unfair treatment of individuals or organizations in programs.

The biased conduct of Oprah Winfrey during the interview was also criticized, as her personal relationship with the couple allowed them to freely make claims without facing any challenging questions or scrutiny.

Moreover, it was revealed that Princess Anne was the one who allegedly questioned the skin tone of Archie, Meghan and Harry's unborn child.

However, Anne's straightforward nature and class make it unlikely that she would make unkind insinuations about her nephew's child.

The comment was likely taken out of context, further damaging Meghan's credibility and portraying her as a victim.

The disappointment extended to Oprah Winfrey as well, as she not only betrayed her audience with false claims but also embarrassed herself as a host.

Her reputation may suffer irreparable damage as a result.

The article also delved into Meghan's attempts to use Harry's health as leverage and her alienation of both her own family and Harry's.

It questioned the character of someone who would betray her husband and his family by publicly discussing private conversations.

The author concluded that there is something seriously wrong with Meghan and called for legal action against both her and the channel that facilitated the interview.

The article highlighted Meghan's alleged ulterior motives, suggesting that she had planned this all along to gain attention and be taken seriously.

It was insinuated that she wanted to return to the United States, become President, and exert influence over the Royal Family.

However, the author expressed doubts about the American public's willingness to believe her and vote her into office.

The damage caused by the interview was emphasized, with predictions of a negative public reaction if Meghan and Harry were to return to the UK.

The article concluded by stating that money and status would never be enough once the novelty wears off, and that respect for the couple has been lost among people from all walks of life.

Do you agree with these opinions?

Share your thoughts in the comments section below and let's discuss together.

If you found this article informative, please like and share it.

Don't forget to subscribe to Kate Middleton and the Queen News Channel to stay updated with our latest news.

Thank you for reading, and we'll see you in the next article.