### Tyler Perry’s Shocking Revelation: Why Lilibet’s Christening Remains Uncertain

Imagine being born into one of the most scrutinized families on the planet.

Your every move is dissected, and your name makes headlines before you even learn to crawl.

Yet, amidst all this attention, a fundamental rite of passage remains unfulfilled.

This is the reality for little Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, whose christening has become a topic of intense speculation and controversy.

For months, royal enthusiasts have been left wondering why Lilibet hasn't been baptized yet.

Recently, Hollywood heavyweight Tyler Perry shed light on this puzzling situation, and his revelations have left Meghan Markle seething with anger.

Could it be that race plays a role in this royal conundrum?

Are the old biases of the British monarchy still alive and kicking?

And how does Perry fit into this intricate narrative?

Buckle up, because what follows may rattle the very core of the royal family.

Traditionally, every Windsor child is christened within a few months of birth.

Just look at Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis; each had grand ceremonies attended by top royals and church officials.

Even Lilibet's older brother, Archie, enjoyed a private but conventional christening in Windsor.

So, why has Lilibet's ceremony been conspicuously absent from the news cycle?

Initially, the speculation pointed to Harry and Meghan stepping back from royal duties, suggesting they might not want to adhere to royal customs anymore.

However, Tyler Perry's recent comments threw a new light on the situation.

After Harry and Meghan relocated from the UK in 2020, they found an unexpected ally in Perry, who generously offered them his Beverly Hills home and provided security when the royal family cut off their financial support.

When Perry spoke about Lilibet's christening, the world took notice.

He revealed that Meghan and Harry wanted their daughter to be baptized in the UK, just like Archie.

Unfortunately, the royal family allegedly refused, citing concerns over a black baby being baptized in the Church of England under traditional royal customs.

Yes, you read that correctly—racism appears to be at the heart of this issue.

This revelation isn't entirely surprising, especially considering the previous allegations of racism directed at the monarchy.

Remember the bombshell Oprah interview where Meghan and Harry disclosed that a senior royal expressed concerns about Archie's skin color prior to his birth?

The fact that Lilibet, a child of mixed heritage, might be denied a christening due to her background only adds another chapter to this troubling narrative.

And how is Meghan handling all this?

Furious barely scratches the surface.

Insiders reveal that she views this as confirmation of her worst fears about the monarchy.

She and Harry left the UK to escape such discrimination, yet their children continue to face prejudice even from afar.

A source close to the couple described Meghan as heartbroken, stating that what should have been a joyous occasion has morphed into a painful reminder of why they chose to leave.

But here's the twist: Meghan and Harry aren't backing down.

If the royal family won't host their daughter's christening, they plan to do it on their own terms.

With the UK seemingly off the table, reports suggest that they are considering a unique ceremony in California, potentially with Tyler Perry himself as the godfather.

While some may view this as a snub to the monarchy, others interpret it as a powerful declaration of independence.

Meghan and Harry are reshaping the narrative, and they don't require royal approval to celebrate their daughter.

This entire saga extends beyond Lilibet; it symbolizes a shift towards a more modern, multicultural future for the monarchy.

However, if the palace's refusal to christen her reflects their stance, it seems they're not quite ready for this evolution.

What happens next?

Will Harry and Meghan ever mend fences with the royal family?

Is Lilibet destined for a baptism in California, far removed from her ancestral traditions?

And will the monarchy ever confront its ongoing issues with racism?

One thing is certain: the world is watching closely.

This situation raises crucial questions.

Is Tyler Perry accurate in his assertions?

Was race indeed the reason behind Lilibet's denied christening?

And what does this imply about the royal family in 2025?

As these discussions unfold, silence is no longer an option when it comes to matters of race, power, and tradition.

The broader implications of Lilibet's christening—or lack thereof—shine a spotlight on the British monarchy's struggle with diversity.

Historically, the royal family has been criticized for its slow adaptation to societal changes, and Meghan's entry into this world only amplified those tensions.

Since Harry and Meghan went public with their relationship, the media has often perpetuated racist narratives, questioning Meghan's suitability as a royal bride.

Now, it seems that bias is extending to their children, with Lilibet possibly being denied a christening solely due to her mixed heritage.

As public perception of the monarchy shifts, especially among younger generations, the institution faces growing scrutiny.

The Oprah interview marked a turning point, prompting many to question the relevance of the monarchy in today's society.

With Perry's latest revelations adding fuel to the fire, criticism is intensifying across social media.

If the royal family indeed denied Lilibet a christening based on her race, they risk losing their claim to being a modern institution.

Amidst the backlash, Meghan and Harry are taking charge of their narrative.

If the palace refuses to acknowledge Lilibet as an equal royal, the couple is determined to ensure the world recognizes her worth.

They are reportedly contemplating a high-profile christening in California, possibly featuring their celebrity friends like Oprah, Serena Williams, and even Tyler Perry.

Such a Hollywood-style event would not only be a bold statement but also a powerful assertion that they don't need royal validation to celebrate their daughter.

Interestingly, the royal family has remained silent regarding these allegations.

After the Oprah interview, they issued a vague response, but now there's nothing.

This raises the question: Does the royal family even care about the growing backlash?

Some speculate they might be waiting for public interest to wane, but ignoring such a pressing issue could lead to another PR disaster, similar to the fallout from the Oprah interview.

If there was any hope for reconciliation between the Sussexes and the royal family, this situation seems to diminish it even further.

Harry has been candid about his struggles within royal life, emphasizing that protecting his family is his top priority.

If the palace is genuinely blocking Lilibet's christening due to her race, it only strengthens Harry's resolve to distance himself from the monarchy.

Ironically, Lilibet, named after Queen Elizabeth II, is being treated as an outsider in the very institution linked to her name.

What lies ahead for the monarchy?

This isn't merely about a christening; it's about the institution's future.

If Perry's claims hold water, it's evident that the British royal family still has a long road ahead in terms of racial equality.

In a world increasingly focused on inclusivity and accountability, clinging to outdated traditions could jeopardize the monarchy's survival.

Harry and Meghan have made their position clear—they will not tolerate racism or silence regarding their children's treatment.

The ball is now in the monarchy's court.

Will they take steps toward meaningful change, or will they continue to ignore the issues at hand, risking their own legacy in the process?

The world is indeed watching.