Meghan Markle’s Burgundy Claim: A Fashion Faux Pas?

In a recent turn of events, the Daily Mail has stirred the pot with its latest headline, declaring burgundy the royal color of the season, crediting Kate Middleton, Zara Tindall, and Princess Beatrice.

However, they claim that Meghan Markle wore it first.

This assertion raises eyebrows and invites a closer look at the fashion landscape surrounding these royal figures.

Meghan Markle appears to be on a mission to stake her claim as a trendsetter in the world of fashion.

But let's be real—her assertion of being the first to don burgundy is a stretch.

The color itself has roots that trace back to the Tudor era.

Sure, Meghan sported a burgundy coat and dress in 2018, but claiming originality for a hue that has graced wardrobes for centuries is a bit much, don't you think?

Now, let's pivot to the royals who have seemingly overshadowed Meghan this season.

Zara Tindall made a striking appearance in a velvet trouser suit during the Christmas Carol concert.

Meanwhile, Catherine dazzled in a bespoke Alexander McQueen coat, complete with perfectly matched accessories.

And let's not forget Beatrice, who looked regal in her silk floral dress.

These ladies are serving looks that are undeniably royal, yet somehow, they're accused of stealing Meghan's spotlight.

But hold on a second.

Meghan wasn't the pioneer of burgundy, and it's important to set the record straight.

Queen Elizabeth II was seen sporting the color back in 2014, a solid four years before Meghan entered the scene with her claim to fame.

Catherine herself wore burgundy during her first Christmas with the royal family in 2011.

Zara, too, has been part of the public eye since childhood, likely wearing burgundy long before Meghan even thought about it.

It seems like the Daily Mail might be overlooking some key details in their quest for a sensational headline.

Why let facts get in the way of a good story?

Burgundy isn't a new or exclusive shade that Meghan can lay claim to; it's a timeless color embraced by many long before she came into the picture.

At this point, one might wonder if Meghan would next claim to have invented toast or taxi rides.

The absurdity of her obsession with being first is becoming rather cringe-worthy.

When will she realize that trying to take credit for something that's been around for ages only makes her look out of touch?

Adding to the irony, Meghan's own attempts at wearing burgundy haven't exactly been met with universal acclaim.

Her infamous red pantsuit, for instance, left much to be desired—some might say it looked better hanging on the rack than on her.

Each time she steps out, there seems to be a sense of confusion surrounding her style choices, often leaving onlookers questioning her fashion decisions.

While Meghan's fashion statements may be memorable, they often don't resonate positively.

Instead, they evoke curiosity about what she was thinking when she chose those outfits.

In contrast, Zara, Catherine, and Beatrice effortlessly embody the elegance associated with royal fashion, each wearing burgundy as if it were their second skin.

For those still clinging to the notion that Meghan is the original queen of burgundy, it's time to face the facts.

This rich color has been part of the fashion narrative long before her arrival.

It's a classic, not a unique find she can claim as her own.

As we continue to navigate the ever-evolving world of fashion, perhaps the Daily Mail could benefit from a little fact-checking before publishing their next headline.

Until then, Meghan will likely persist in her self-proclaimed title as the first to wear everything, regardless of the truth behind her claims.