Must Read
Sussexes’ Holiday Card Sparks Outrage as PR Stunt Backfires
In a world where celebrity antics often steal the spotlight, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again found themselves at the center of a media storm.
Their recent holiday card, released under the banner of the Archibald Foundation, has elicited more cringe-worthy reactions than Meghan's earlier career on “Deal or No Deal.”
Instead of charming their audience, the Sussexes seem to have stumbled into a web of embarrassment.
This year's festive greeting was unveiled not through a glamorous magazine spread or a high-profile friend, but via Omid Scobie—an author and royal biographer who has become synonymous with the couple's public relations efforts.
Ironically, Scobie had previously testified that he did not have a personal relationship with the Sussexes, raising eyebrows about his newfound role as their spokesperson.
If you've been following the ups and downs of the Sussexes, you might have noticed that their recent polo outings flopped spectacularly, much like Meghan's podcast venture.
In an apparent attempt to divert attention from these setbacks, the couple decided to showcase their children, Archie and Lilibet, albeit in a rather pixelated manner.
The message seemed clear: “Look at our perfect family!
And please, let's not discuss polo.”
However, the holiday card exudes a vibe that could be described as less than genuine.
The images are blurry, distant, and give off the impression that they were hastily assembled during a late-night creative session.
It's almost as if they whipped it up on a free design platform while indulging in a few too many glasses of wine.
Where's the high-resolution family portrait?
Instead, we get vague snapshots from a safe distance, making one wonder about the authenticity of the moment.
With all the money flowing in from their Netflix deal, one would expect a little more effort in crafting a polished holiday card.
Yet, here we are, greeted with questionable photo quality and awkward angles.
The most glaring faux pas?
Choosing to have Scobie share this holiday gem, which inadvertently confirms what many have long suspected: he is firmly in the Sussexes' corner.
As Scobie enthusiastically captioned the post, he referred to the Sussexes sharing “highlights” of their year.
But let's be real—what constitutes a highlight?
Trips to Colombia, poses that look forced, and Lilibet sporting prairie socks hardly scream festive cheer.
Who decided that blurry images of children belong on a corporate Christmas card anyway?
The question looms large: Are Harry and Meghan merely desperate for attention?
With months of speculation suggesting that their star power might be fading, this holiday card appears to be a last-ditch effort to remind the public of their existence.
It's as if they're pleading, “Please, don't forget about us!”
Meanwhile, Harry's hectic travel schedule hints that he may not have spent much time with his children lately.
This raises eyebrows about his dedication as a father, particularly when juxtaposed with the image of a doting dad they seem to want to project.
The card inadvertently showcases a disconnect between their public persona and private reality.
What does this holiday card ultimately reveal?
For one, it reinforces the notion that Omid Scobie remains tightly woven into Meghan's narrative, effectively serving as her public relations lapdog.
The blurry images of their kids will not win over a public that has witnessed the Wales children grow up front and center, enjoying the spotlight in a more authentic manner.
Desperate attempts at public relations rarely end well, and this holiday card is no exception.
It feels more like a poorly executed performance designed to reshape narratives rather than a sincere gesture of goodwill.
The Sussexes' holiday highlight reel appears less about spreading joy and more about self-promotion.
As for Scobie, who once prided himself on being a journalist, he now seems to have traded credibility for the role of unofficial spokesperson for the Sussexes.
In this PR game, it's clear that he's lost more than just his journalistic integrity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87523/87523fa2bb388cca825a7ee4ab8a47f9b72e621e" alt=""