Is Prince Harry Really Charles’ Son?

The Truth Behind the Royal Paternity Debate

Ever since the charming red-haired Prince Harry appeared in the British royal family, debates have raged on about his true paternity.

People are still talking about it, speculating whether he is indeed the biological son of Prince Charles.

The truth of the matter is that Princess Diana had an affair with a British army officer and writing instructor named James Hewitt.

Their relationship supposedly began in 1986, although some believe it started earlier.

This has led to speculation that Harry may be the product of this extramarital affair.

Despite the rumors, James Hewitt has always vehemently denied being Harry's father, stating that he hadn't even met Diana when her youngest son was born.

Additionally, Diana herself explained that the red-haired trait runs in her family, suggesting that Harry simply inherited it genetically.

While there is no concrete evidence to support the theory of Hewitt's paternity, it remains incredibly popular among certain circles.

Comparisons between photos of James Hewitt and Prince Harry are frequently made online, further fueling the speculation.

In 2003, rumors even circulated that a British tabloid had managed to conduct a DNA test, which reportedly yielded a negative result.

However, it's worth noting that this was not the first time the media had brought up the topic of DNA testing.

Allegedly, in the mid-90s, the royal family allegedly pressured Princess Diana into consenting to a paternity test to confirm Charles' parentage.

According to this version of events, Diana did not disclose the true purpose of the blood sample, leaving Harry unaware of the doubts surrounding his parentage.

Recently, sources claim that Prince Harry himself has been contemplating his roots, with Meghan Markle supposedly encouraging him to do so.