Sussex Shocked as U.S. Amendment Forbids Lily from Princess Title

In a surprising turn of events, Sussex finds itself in disbelief as the U.S. Amendment Constitution prohibits Lily, the daughter of Harry and Meghan, from being granted the princess title.

The shocking revelation comes after the couple referred to their own children as prince and princess.

They claimed to have invited the King and Prince of Wales to a christening at their home, excluding Meghan’s father and family, but unfortunately, they did not attend.

Adding to the drama, Ngozi Fulani asserts that she possesses a recording device with evidence of the incident and demands a public apology from the British Royal Family (BRF).

One cannot help but wonder whether Harry and Meghan are unknowingly setting their children up for potential bullying, ridicule, and humiliation by bestowing these titles upon them.

It is important to note that both of their children are American citizens, and their parents have already ensured that they will never truly have a place or relationship within the working members of the British monarchy.

Who exactly is expected to be impressed by their children’s titles?

While it is unfair to generalize, it seems that most Americans couldn’t care less about such distinctions.

These titles hold no significance outside of the Harkles’ immediate circle, where they may demand their staff or others to address their children accordingly.

This desperate grasp for attention raises eyebrows and questions their true intentions.

The United States Constitution clearly states, “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States, and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state” (Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8).

This constitutional provision reflects the American aversion to aristocracy and aligns with the republican nature of the government established by the Constitution.

It complements other constitutional provisions, including the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, which prohibit discriminatory distinctions between classes of American citizens.

Historically, the Articles of Confederation and many state constitutions during the revolutionary era also included prohibitions on titles of nobility and hereditary privilege.

Therefore, if Harry and Meghan are raising their children as U.S. citizens, they should understand that using these titles to claim privileges is not their entitlement.

Furthermore, they themselves are not exempt from this limitation.

If they desire to be addressed as the Duke and Duchess, they should seek a country that recognizes such titles, as insisting on their usage within the United States infringes upon the constitutional rights of its citizens.

The same applies to Harry, often referred to as “Ginger.”

If he wishes to maintain his title and privileges, he should consider returning to the UK, all the while understanding that the cost of his security will not be covered.

It is becoming increasingly evident that these actions by Harry and Meghan are exposing them to unnecessary risks.

By continually putting themselves in the spotlight, they are essentially painting a larger target on their backs.

It appears that they have willingly sacrificed their integrity for personal gain.

Their decision regarding their first child, whom they deliberately named in a manner far removed from any association with royalty, reflects their desire to break away from tradition.

The Sussexes perceive themselves as superior, enlightened, and agents of modernization within the monarchy.

They reject titles because they believe they are above them.