Connect with us

News all day

Title: Mystery Surrounds Meghan’s Baby Photo as Doubts Arise About Children’s Existence

Photos: GETTY

Must Read

Title: Mystery Surrounds Meghan’s Baby Photo as Doubts Arise About Children’s Existence

A brand new photo of has sparked widespread speculation and controversy on social media.

The image, posted early on Thanksgiving morning, shows Meghan standing at the back door of a private jet, cradling a baby wrapped in a swaddling cloth as she boards the plane.

However, it is unclear whether the photo was taken recently or during one of Meghan's previous outings.

What caught the attention of many was the peculiar position of the baby in Meghan's arms, leading some to believe that she was actually holding a doll.

Speculation arose that the doll in question was a Darren doll, as it appeared too small to be her one-year-old child, whom we have seen in previous photos.

Holding a one-year-old child in such a manner without supporting their head and neck seemed unusual to many observers.

Adding to the intrigue, there have been tweets suggesting that Meghan and 's second child, Lillibet, does not actually exist.

According to these tweets, no one has seen any children accompanying the couple, not even at passport control.

Furthermore, rumors have circulated that Her Majesty the Queen is battling bone cancer, making it highly unlikely that she would be engaging with children or even present during public appearances.

Questions have also been raised about the authenticity of the children seen in photos shared from Montecito.

Some of these images feature an assortment of children, displaying a range of physical characteristics, including different hair types, skin tones, and even missing limbs.

Strikingly, some of these children bear a striking resemblance to friends of the Sussexes.

However, despite claims by individuals who supposedly interviewed , no concrete evidence or photographs have been produced to verify the identity of these children.

Scrutiny has been placed on Netflix as well, as it has been suggested that the streaming platform did not film or witness the presence of these children.

Critics argue that the hair and facial features of the children in question constantly change, leading them to believe that the images are nothing more than realistic-looking dolls created through photoshopping techniques.

Genetically, it is argued, it would be highly unlikely for Meghan and Harry to have two children with fair skin and straight fine hair.

Adding fuel to the fire, there have been claims that Meghan borrowed Hartford Schroeder to quickly showcase a picture of Lily.

However, her request to borrow the child was allegedly denied, as it was deemed too far and logistically challenging.

Doubts persist regarding the veracity of the Sussexes' claims about their children, and some individuals believe it is time for someone other than nannies to provide concrete proof of their existence.

In the midst of these controversies, questions arise as to why the Sussexes have not officially announced their transition from being members of the monarchy to becoming part of Prince Charles' family.

The lack of clarity surrounding their status only adds to the intrigue and skepticism surrounding their actions.

As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen whether the truth will emerge and put an end to the speculation surrounding Meghan Markle's baby photo and the existence of her children.

The public eagerly awaits further evidence and confirmation, hoping for transparency and clarity from the couple.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
You may also like...

More in Must Read

Viral stories

Popular topics

Archie Camilla Kate Middleton King Charles Lilibet Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey Prince Andrew Prince Edward Prince Harry Prince Louis Prince Philip Princess Anne Princess Beatrice Princess Charlotte Princess Diana Princess Eugenie Prince William Queen Elizabeth

To Top