Nana Akua Slams Oprah and Defends Piers over Meghan Comments

Nana Akua, co-host of GB News' Great British Breakfast, expressed her support for Piers Morgan in the ongoing debate surrounding the Ofcom ruling.

The ruling, which found that Piers was within his rights during the heated discussion about Meghan Markle back in March, has sparked controversy and garnered more than 57,000 complaints against Good Morning Britain.

Nana Akua hailed the finding as fantastic and emphasized Piers Morgan's right to hold an opinion.

She pointed out that during the bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, none of Meghan Markle's claims were challenged, leading to the subsequent debate on Good Morning Britain and Piers Morgan's departure from the ITV show.

“I'm really glad now,” the 50-year-old journalist commented.

“It feels like the pendulum has slightly shifted, and now people are understanding that it's okay to have an opinion.

We can't just have an agreed narrative that everyone goes along with.

We have to be able to say honestly what we think.”

Nana Akua further criticized Oprah for not challenging any of Meghan Markle's statements during the interview.

She highlighted that at least 17 points made by Meghan have been proven to be untrue or inconsistent with the truth.

Nana Akua questioned why Oprah shouldn't be challenged for other things she said, expressing her satisfaction with the ruling.

Journalist James Marlow joined the discussion, explaining Piers Morgan's stance on freedom of expression.

He stated that Piers always claimed he had the right to express his feelings, as long as it wasn't offensive according to Ofcom rules.

However, the line between offense and differing opinions can be blurry, as what might be offensive to some may not be to others.

Nana Akua interjected, asserting that causing a level of offense is acceptable if it reflects one's general view.

Tom Harwood, Nana's co-host, added that the crucial point is to ensure there is sufficient challenge to that view, allowing for a balanced discussion.

Ofcom's ruling affirmed Piers Morgan's entitlement to his opinion, vindicating him in the process.

The decision sparked speculation about Piers' potential return to ITV, but he made it clear that he has no intention of going back.

He mentioned a new opportunity with a global network system, though details remain unknown.

Meanwhile, the morning show's ratings have plummeted since Piers' departure, leaving ITV puzzled.

In March, Piers faced a flood of complaints after expressing disbelief in Meghan Markle's claims of feeling suicidal while part of the royal family.

On September 1, Ofcom declared Piers' comments acceptable, stating that restricting such opinions would infringe upon freedom of expression.

Piers took to Twitter to celebrate the news, describing it as a victory for free speech and a defeat for “Princess Pinocchio.”

In conclusion, Nana Akua's support for Piers Morgan and her criticism of Oprah Winfrey's interview approach have stirred further debate around the Ofcom ruling.

While Piers remains firm in his decision not to return to ITV, the impact of his absence on the morning show's ratings cannot be ignored.

The ruling has ignited discussions on freedom of expression and the importance of challenging differing viewpoints in the media landscape.