The Sussex Circus: A Royal Christening Gone Awry

In the ever-evolving saga of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the latest chapter has left many shaking their heads in disbelief.

The couple, known for their penchant for drama, has once again managed to turn a simple event into a spectacle that raises eyebrows and questions alike.

This time, the focus is on the christening of their daughter, Lilibet, which has spiraled into a series of blunders that could rival any circus performance.

At first glance, one might think a royal christening is a straightforward affair.

However, true to form, Harry and Meghan have taken this traditional ceremony and infused it with their signature flair for the absurd.

The announcement of their daughter's christening was met with a flurry of confusion, particularly surrounding the title they decided to bestow upon her.

One moment she's just Lilibet, and the next she's being referred to as Princess Lilibet.

It's a dizzying shift that leaves many wondering: what's the endgame here?

The most striking misstep came when the couple claimed that Princess Lilibet was christened by the Archbishop of Los Angeles.

Here's the kicker—there is no Archbishop of Los Angeles.

How does a couple with access to top-notch public relations teams make such a fundamental error?

It's almost as if they're playing a game of make-believe without bothering to check the rules first.

Ironically, this blunder comes from a couple that frequently calls for accuracy in reporting.

As commentator Kate Garraway pointedly noted, if you're going to challenge the media about the truth, you'd better get your own facts straight.

Yet, in this instance, Harry and Meghan seem to have missed the mark entirely, opting instead for a whimsical narrative over factual integrity.

To add fuel to the fire, the actual officiant at the christening turned out to be Bishop John Harvey Taylor, not an Archbishop as they claimed.

It's hard not to chuckle at the thought of a conversation between the couple about the difference between these two titles.

Did they really think it didn't matter?

The whole scenario paints a picture of a couple desperately seeking royal validation while fumbling through the details.

This incident highlights a deeper issue: the Sussexes' relentless quest for attention.

Why announce the christening months after it occurred?

And why the sudden use of royal titles they previously distanced themselves from?

It feels like a calculated move to remain in the public eye, akin to a friend who constantly posts cryptic messages on social media, fishing for concern.

The mystery surrounding their children further complicates the narrative.

Harry and Lilibet are rarely seen in public, leading some to speculate whether they're real or merely figments of the couple's imagination.

Are these kids just props in Harry and Meghan's ongoing quest for sympathy and relevance?

The entire situation is starting to resemble a poorly scripted reality show.

Then there's the audacity of the Sussexes themselves.

Here they are, flaunting royal titles while simultaneously deriding the institution that bestowed them.

It's reminiscent of someone quitting a job but still showing up at the office for free lunch.

Meanwhile, actual royals like William and Kate are diligently performing their duties, providing support to those in need, while Harry and Meghan seem to be stuck in a perpetual state of fantasy.

Reflecting on Harry's journey, it's disheartening to witness how far he has strayed from his roots.

Once a beloved figure within the royal family, he now seems to be relegated to the role of Meghan's sidekick, complete with a metaphorical umbrella.

It's like watching a Shakespearean tragedy unfold, but instead of noble themes, we're left with tales of privileged ex-royals struggling for relevance.

As for Meghan, her desire for recognition is palpable.

Yet, being royal transcends mere titles and lavish ceremonies; it embodies service and dedication to others.

Sadly, it appears she has opted out of these values in favor of self-promotion and dramatic flair.

The christening itself took place at their home in Montecito, which many interpret as an indication that they couldn't secure attendance from any actual royals.

They extended invitations to King Charles, Camilla, William, and Kate, but none made the trip.

Could it be that they were preoccupied with their royal responsibilities, or perhaps they simply couldn't find Montecito on a map?

Timing also plays a crucial role in this narrative.

Lilibet was 21 months old at the time of her christening, a significant departure from the typical practice of christening royal babies at just a few months old.

It's as if they're crafting their own rules while disregarding tradition altogether.

In the grand scheme of things, Harry and Meghan had a unique opportunity to carve a new path for themselves, to effect real change in the world.

Instead, they seem to be mired in a cycle of public relations disasters, each more baffling than the last.

If there were medals for public gaffes, they would undoubtedly sweep the podium.

As we look ahead, one can only wonder what the next twist in the Sussex saga will be.

Will Archie be knighted by a foreign dignitary?

Will Lilibet take on a grand title fit for a fairytale?

At this point, anything seems possible.

Yet, every misstep they take only reinforces the notion that they may not be cut out for royal life—or even life in the public eye.

So, as the curtain falls on the Great Lilibet Christening debacle, we're left with a mix of amusement and disbelief.

With fake titles, imaginary archbishops, and enough drama to fill a season of a soap opera, it's a saga that continues to captivate and confound.

What do you think?

Is this the final blow to Harry and Meghan's credibility?

Will they ever learn to double-check their facts?

And most importantly, do you believe those kids really exist?