**Title: Meghan Markle and the Curious Case of Royal Erasure**

In a surprising twist, it seems our beloved Duchess Meghan Markle has vanished from the royal narrative faster than you can say “royal family.”

As we delve into the latest revelations regarding the Royal Collection Trust, it's hard not to notice the conspicuous absence of Meghan and her children, Archie and Lilibet, from the royal archives.

The question on everyone's lips is: why?

Imagine walking through the King's gallery, admiring centuries of regal portraits, only to realize that not a single image of Meghan exists among them.

Yes, you read that right—no photographs, no formal portraits, not even a candid shot of her with the family.

It's as if someone took a royal eraser to history.

And let's not forget about the kids; neither Archie nor Lilibet appears in the collection either.

This is particularly baffling given that the Royal Collection boasts millions of objects spanning five centuries.

Now, before we jump to conclusions, the Royal Collection Trust has provided an explanation.

They claim that their current exhibition, “Royal Portraits: A Century of Photography,” focuses solely on organized portrait sittings.

Fair enough, but let's be real—Meghan and Harry had their fair share of official photographs taken during their time as working royals.

Remember that stunning engagement photo?

Or the wedding portraits that had everyone buzzing?

Even the heartwarming first image of baby Archie with the Queen should qualify.

So, what gives?

Is this a deliberate snub from King Charles, or merely an oversight?

Either way, the implications are significant.

The absence of Meghan from the exhibition feels like a calculated move, one that would make even the most stoic royal guards crack a smile.

It raises eyebrows and fuels speculation about the monarchy's attitude towards its members who step outside the traditional mold.

Turning our attention to Prince Harry, it's equally intriguing to note that he too is missing from the adult photographs in the exhibition.

The only image of him on display harks back to 1994, showcasing a young boy alongside his brother William and their mother, Princess Diana.

It's almost as if the royal family is hitting rewind on Harry's life, pretending that the complexities of adulthood and his recent memoir don't exist.

In stark contrast, Prince William shines in the spotlight with no fewer than five images featured in the exhibition.

It's hard not to perceive this as favoritism, akin to a parent proudly displaying one child's achievements while conveniently overlooking another's.

Some might argue that Meghan's brief tenure as a royal doesn't warrant inclusion, but her impact during that time cannot be understated.

She brought fresh perspectives and ignited conversations that resonated globally.

The absence of photographs of Archie and Lilibet is particularly perplexing.

These children are part of the royal lineage, yet they are seemingly erased from the visual narrative of the monarchy.

It raises questions about how the institution chooses to portray its family dynamics and whether this is a subtle message aimed at the California branch of the royal family.

As we ponder the ramifications of this situation, it becomes clear that it speaks volumes about the monarchy's approach to history and representation.

In an era where diversity and inclusion are paramount, the exclusion of Meghan—a woman of color who briefly held a royal title—raises concerns about historical representation.

Are we witnessing a form of whitewashing?

Critics may argue that the exhibition's focus is solely on the evolution of royal photography and that Meghan simply didn't fit that narrative.

But then, why include multiple images of William while excluding adult photos of Harry?

If the aim is to showcase a comprehensive royal history, shouldn't all relevant figures be represented?

In an age dominated by social media and constant documentation, the absence of any official images of Archie and Lilibet in the royal collection is perplexing.

We've all seen the charming family photos shared during holidays, so how could none of these make it into the official archives?

It's almost as if the royal family is attempting to erase the saga of Meghan and Harry from public consciousness.

This situation highlights the delicate balance the monarchy must strike between maintaining tradition and adapting to modern realities.

The royal family is undeniably fascinating, but their refusal to acknowledge internal family dynamics only serves to keep the drama alive.

By trying to present a polished image, they risk appearing out of touch with contemporary society.

Ultimately, this ongoing saga is more than just gossip.

It reflects broader themes of family, identity, and representation within the royal narrative.

As Archie and Lilibet grow, the potential for reconciliation with their royal roots remains.

However, if the monarchy continues to act as though they don't exist, the likelihood of that happening diminishes.

So, what's the takeaway?

A little inclusivity could go a long way.

Acknowledging Meghan, Harry, and their children in the royal narrative would not only reflect reality but also resonate with people worldwide.

After all, it's the human elements—the struggles, the triumphs, the familial ties—that make the royal story relatable.

As we continue to watch this drama unfold, one thing is certain: the royal family's decisions will always keep us guessing.

What do you think, dear readers?

Is this a calculated omission, or are we making a mountain out of a molehill?

The conversation is far from over, and I'll be here, ready to dissect every twist and turn.