Must Read
### Meghan Markle’s Lavish Baby Shower: A Royal Faux Pas?
In the ever-spinning world of royal gossip, a recent event has sparked a fiery debate, igniting opinions across social media platforms.
Jeremy Clarkson, the outspoken television personality and journalist, has taken a bold stance on Meghan Markle's extravagant baby shower held in New York City.
His commentary has stirred the pot, and it's safe to say that this topic is juicier than a ripe summer peach.
For those who may not be familiar, Meghan Markle, the former actress turned Duchess, has often found herself at the center of controversy since marrying Prince Harry.
After stepping back from royal duties, she and Harry moved to California, seemingly trading the royal life for Hollywood glamour.
However, her recent decision to host a lavish baby shower aboard a private jet has raised eyebrows and sparked criticism.
Clarkson didn't hold back in his latest column, labeling the baby shower as “stupid” and “unroyal.” Can you imagine Queen Elizabeth II hosting a baby shower?
The image is almost laughable—her Majesty surrounded by gifts like baby onesies and diaper cream.
Yet, here we are, witnessing Meghan embrace an American tradition that many see as out of place within the royal family.
The criticism didn't stop there.
Clarkson pointed out the glaring hypocrisy of Meghan, who has been vocal about climate change, yet chose to travel via private jet to her extravagant celebration.
While private jets are undoubtedly luxurious, they are hardly eco-friendly.
It seems that when it comes to partying with celebrities, those environmental concerns take a backseat.
Adding fuel to the fire, Dickie Arbiter, the former spokesman for the Queen, also weighed in on the situation.
He remarked that baby showers are a distinctly American custom and suggested that Meghan's choices were a bit excessive.
To put it mildly, comparing the lavishness of the event to a minor navigation error of the Titanic might actually be an understatement.
The penthouse suite where the shower took place reportedly cost a staggering £57,000 per night—more than what many people earn in a year.
The guest list was equally star-studded, featuring names like Serena Williams and Amal Clooney.
It felt more like the Met Gala than a quiet royal gathering.
One can only imagine the spectacle, complete with Beyoncé emerging from a cake, serenading the attendees.
Yet amidst the glitz, some palace staff reportedly expressed their dismay, with one aide rolling their eyes at the entire affair.
Royal author Omid Scobie noted that such a lavish celebration for a royal baby was unprecedented.
Most royals understand that their role is to serve the public, not indulge in extravagant displays of wealth.
Meghan's approach, however, seems to blur those lines, transforming the royal narrative into something resembling a reality TV show.
In an attempt at damage control, a palace aide claimed that baby showers are not frowned upon in the UK.
Nice try, but the general consensus is that Meghan's extravagance highlights a disconnect from royal traditions.
The only thing common about this shower was the apparent lack of common sense displayed.
Interestingly, Meghan wasn't the first royal to have a baby shower; that honor belongs to Kate Middleton.
However, Kate's celebration was notably low-key and didn't involve crossing the Atlantic.
It's almost as if she grasped the idea that being royal requires a measure of restraint and decorum.
Some might argue that Meghan is merely celebrating her impending motherhood.
But being part of the royal family is about more than just personal celebrations; it's about duty and representing the institution.
Meghan's actions seem to reflect a desire for celebrity status rather than an understanding of her role.
Ultimately, Meghan had a golden opportunity to leverage her platform for meaningful causes.
Instead, she risks becoming a cautionary tale about losing sight of one's purpose amid fame.
If there's a lesson to be learned here, it's that marrying into royalty should come with an understanding of the responsibilities that accompany such a title.
So, Meghan, if you're tuning in, perhaps consider a more grounded approach next time.
The British public—and your carbon footprint—would surely appreciate a little less extravagance.
And while we're at it, maybe share that advice with Prince Harry, too.
The royal family could use a dose of humility in these tumultuous times.