**Whoopi Goldberg Takes Aim at Meghan Markle’s Claims of Objectification**

In a recent discussion, Whoopi Goldberg firmly rejected Meghan Markle's assertion that she felt objectified during her time on the game show “Deal or No Deal.”

Goldberg's response was blunt and to the point: she suggested that if Markle felt that way, perhaps she should consider the feelings of the other women involved, who were also trying to make a living.

It's refreshing to see someone speak candidly, and Goldberg's words certainly struck a chord.

Markle has been quite vocal in her podcast interviews, revealing what some interpret as her true self.

Critics argue that the real issue was never about her royal duties; instead, it was about Markle herself.

If “Deal or No Deal” was such a troubling experience for her, one has to wonder what her actual grievances with the royal family were.

After all, they didn't force her to open suitcases on national television.

Many believe Markle portrays herself as a perpetual victim, even in situations where she actively sought out the spotlight.

Her comments suggest she felt above the other contestants, implying that they were somehow less worthy than she was.

This attitude has led some to label her as the epitome of “main character syndrome,” where she perceives herself as uniquely special and believes others are envious of her.

The narrative surrounding Markle often includes claims of racism and jealousy, yet critics point out that she chose to enter the entertainment industry, a field notoriously focused on appearances.

With countless career paths available, her decision to pursue fame and celebrity raises eyebrows.

Those who know her story wonder why she didn't aim for a more intellectually stimulating career.

Despite her attempts to project an image of intelligence and significance, many see a stark lack of self-awareness in Markle's behavior.

Critics argue that she could have carved out a niche in the industry that showcased her intellect, but her choices suggest otherwise.

Instead, she often comes across as a performer rather than a thinker.

Interestingly, it appears that a broad consensus is forming around Markle's public persona.

While she may have envisioned a legacy of achievement, the prevailing sentiment seems to be that she has become an insufferable figure, desperate for attention.

When someone like Whoopi Goldberg offers criticism, it signals a significant shift in public perception.

Goldberg's remarks resonate particularly with Black women in America, many of whom have faced genuine hardships and discrimination.

They seem to be growing increasingly frustrated with Markle's narrative, which they feel undermines their experiences.

The backlash against Markle is palpable, and it raises questions about her understanding of the criticism she faces.

As more voices from the Black community join the conversation, there's hope that the discourse will shift from mere virtue-signaling to a more honest critique of Markle's actions and statements.

Lydia Jordan, another commentator, implied that Markle's performance on “Deal or No Deal” was subpar, raising eyebrows about her claims of feeling belittled by the role.

It's becoming evident that Markle's podcast may be doing more harm than good for her reputation.

Some speculate that extending the series beyond its planned twelve episodes could lead to further self-sabotage.

If she truly possessed the intellect she claims, one might expect her to navigate this situation differently.

At the core of the discussion lies the fact that Markle's rise to fame was largely based on her appearance.

Critics have pointed out that she was compensated handsomely for a relatively short stint on “Deal or No Deal,” suggesting she had ample opportunity to explore other avenues if she desired.

As the conversation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how Markle will respond to these critiques.

For now, it seems that the tide is turning against her narrative, and many are eager to see how this will impact her future endeavors.