Prince Harry’s Coronation Fallout: A Storm Brewing in Montecito

Fresh off the heels of Prince Harry's controversial absence from the coronation, royal author Tom Bower predicts an even nastier turn of events for the Sussexes.

Bower suggests that Harry's anger will only grow, leading to a potential clash with the royal family.

The concern lies in the fact that the royals have become a soft target, with Charles unwilling to respond to attacks.

This vulnerability leaves them exposed to further criticism and potential embarrassment.

It's clear that Harry is furious and feels humiliated.

However, one must question what he expected from the royal family.

He declined to attend the coronation lunch and skipped the concert, both of which presented opportunities for him to be present.

So, what did he anticipate the royal family to do?

According to Bower, Harry expects an apology and naively believes that things will fall his way.

But as he returns to Montecito, he will realize that this is not the case.

This realization may lead him to make their lives infinitely more difficult and seek ways to embarrass them.

Adding fuel to the fire are those who claim that the balcony was too white.

This racially charged argument is being pushed by anti-monarchists, who see an opportunity to undermine the monarchy.

The monarchy has become an easy target for diversity extremists, and they are determined to go even further.

Unfortunately, Harry and Meghan seem to find comfort in these claims, further exacerbating the situation.

Meghan's absence from the coronation could be seen as a statement against the royal institution.

She sees herself as the leader of the anti-royal faction, while Harry reluctantly goes along with her plans to avoid homelessness and aimless wandering.

This American woke mentality, with its anti-establishment and anti-white liberal democracy, has taken hold in Britain, and the royal family has become the first hurdle for these diversity extremists.

One concern is that King Charles, formerly the Prince of Wales, seems to be listening to these voices.

Guido Harry, the former Director of Communications for Boris Johnson, reveals an incident where Charles criticized the Rwanda scheme and advocated for reparations over slavery.

Despite being advised against it, Charles went on stage and made the speech anyway.

Now, as King, he continues to open the door to historic reparations.

This behavior aligns with Bower's long-standing argument against Charles, highlighting his inability to stop meddling and his refusal to listen to opposing opinions.

The Commonwealth is also at risk under King Charles.

Bower believes that Charles has shown little interest in the Commonwealth throughout his time as Prince of Wales.

He lacks a genuine relationship with the countries involved and has no desire to travel there.

This raises questions about how King Charles will interact with political leaders and how Prince William will handle the situation.

William, unlike his father, is not an interventionist and does not involve himself in politics.

It remains to be seen how the new king will navigate these complexities.

While William and Kate had a united front during the coronation, their relationship hasn't always been smooth sailing.

Harry's departure seemingly brought them closer together, with the Queen urging William to make amends.

This unity is crucial for the survival of the monarchy.

However, the real question is whether Charles will be able to resist meddling in politics.

His recent sleepover guests, including Keir Starmer and his wife, raise concerns about potential influence and the possibility of putting himself in the firing line.

As the storm continues to brew in Montecito, it is clear that the fallout from the coronation will have far-reaching consequences.

The Sussexes' actions and the responses of the royal family will shape the future of the monarchy.

Only time will tell how this saga unfolds and whether King Charles can resist the urge to meddle in politics.