Allegations Surface: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Accused of Misusing Foreign Aid Donations

New allegations have come to light, suggesting that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are allegedly retaining a significant portion, reportedly 95%, of donations meant for the Invictus Games in Nigeria, which were intended as foreign aid.

The couple's recent visit to Nigeria, characterized as a semi-official tour, has sparked debates about their current roles and standing.

Invited by Nigeria's top military figure, Christopher Musa, Meghan and Harry spent three days in the country.

During a conversation with host Nana Akua Cohen, Cohen shed light on a critical and often misunderstood aspect, particularly among their American supporters.

Cohen pointed out that Harry and Meghan have shifted from being seen as members of the royal family to being viewed as celebrities.

He shared his insights on the couple's recent rebranding efforts and criticized Meghan's involvement in promoting jam as part of her new venture, American Riviera Orchard.

Cohen remarked on GBN America that the couple seems to be striving to regain a status they voluntarily relinquished in 2020.

Their current quasi-royal tour appears to be more about representing themselves rather than any nation.

Information from Meghan's Microphone X, reportedly sourced from Lanny of Barbados Information, suggests that the couple may be using their 501 charity status to receive donations for Artool from foreign aid in the countries they visit.

The allegation implies that they keep 95% of these funds due to their ties with Artool in Delaware.

This development raises concerns about their visits to other nations like Jamaica and Canada and whether they aim to secure additional foreign aid contributions.

Speculations suggest that they allocate only 5% of the received funds within the donating country.

Criticism has been directed at the existing law, sponsored by Joe Biden during his time as a senator, that allows charities to be headquartered in Delaware.

Some argue that this legislation enables charitable organizations to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.

While corporations often face backlash for not meeting their tax obligations, similar scrutiny should extend to charities as well.

If the allegations can be substantiated by intelligence services and brought to the attention of King Charles III, it might prompt him to take action, such as suspending titles, revoking titles, or issuing a statement to discourage such practices.

King Charles III has been briefed on multiple breaches and actions that violate the Sandringham Summit agreement between Prince Harry, Meghan, and the late Queen.

Concerns have been raised about the sustainability of the couple's chosen lifestyle.

Harry has expressed dissatisfaction with embarking on tours, while Meghan reportedly completed only two tours before stepping back.

Questions linger about how many countries would be willing to host them under their specific terms.

While a country might provide security during their visit and arrange access to a private airport, organizing multiple days of activities for individuals who do not officially represent any entity raises eyebrows.