Controversy Surrounding Archie’s Birth: A Royal Photographer’s Critique

The birth of Archie, the first child of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, sent shockwaves through the press, with one renowned royal photographer deeming it a departure from longstanding royal customs.

Breaking tradition, the Sussexes chose to forgo the customary photo session on the steps of London's private Portland Hospital following Archie's arrival on May 6, 2019.

Instead, the world caught its initial glimpse of the royal baby two days later during a carefully orchestrated photo opportunity at St. George's Hall in Windsor Castle.

In an exclusive interview with The Sun, British photographer Arthur Edwards, known for his extensive work with the royal family spanning decades, openly criticized Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for their unconventional approach to parenthood.

Edwards accused the couple of prioritizing their own preferences over adhering to established postpartum rituals, a departure from the practices observed since Princess Anne's time in the 1980s.

He insinuated that the entire birth event was meticulously staged to cater to the couple's desires.

Edwards further lambasted the press for disseminating inaccurate information regarding the timing of Markle's labor and delivery, humorously remarking that Archie seemed on the verge of sprouting teeth before the media even caught wind of his birth.

According to the publication Page Six, Markle initially intended to give birth to Archie at Frogmore Cottage, their former residence in the UK, under the care of an all-female team of midwives.

However, due to her son's delayed arrival, medical professionals advised her to undergo hospital delivery instead.

Speculation surrounding Archie's birth quickly gained traction on social media, fueling rumors and conspiracy theories questioning the legitimacy of both Archie and his younger sister, Lilibet.

Some skeptics went as far as suggesting that other mothers may have lent their infants for staged photo opportunities involving Archie.

Notably, a YouTube video titled “Meghan Markle's Fake Baby Expose” on the Daily Empress channel garnered significant attention, proposing that Archie might be a lifelike doll based on purported doll-like features observed during public appearances.

Critics honed in on Archie's apparent stillness in Prince Harry's arms during the public unveiling, prompting doubts about his authenticity.

Comparisons were drawn between the video footage of Welsh introducing their newborn and Harry and Meghan's introduction of Archie, highlighting the perceived differences in the infants' level of activity.

While Welsh's babies appeared lively and animated, Archie seemed unusually passive, leading some to question the validity of the scenario.

Amidst the speculation, questions arose regarding the timeline of Archie's birth, particularly following cryptic remarks made by Prince Harry suggesting that Archie might have been older than initially portrayed during his introduction.