Meghan Markle’s Misuse of Royal Title Sparks Controversy

Recent reports have shed light on Meghan Markle's alleged misuse of her royal title to exert influence and potentially intimidate individuals, prompting a strong response from General Christopher Moussa.

Meghan and Prince Harry made headlines last year when they stepped down from their senior royal roles, relocating to California with their children.

Despite this move, concerns have emerged over Meghan's continued use of her Royal Highness (HRH) title, even though she is no longer actively engaged in royal duties.

When the Duke and Duchess of Sussex decided to step back from their royal responsibilities, they agreed to refrain from using their HRH titles for professional purposes.

Nevertheless, they still retain these titles, leading to criticism directed at Meghan for leveraging her HRH status in situations where it may not be appropriate.

Reports indicate instances over the past year where Meghan allegedly employed her HRH designation to influence or pressure individuals and organizations.

One particular incident involved Meghan reportedly sending emails to British Members of Parliament advocating for paid paternal leave, signing off as the Duchess of Sussex with her HRH title attached.

Critics argue that such actions are unwarranted, as Meghan is no longer fulfilling official royal duties and should not be utilizing her royal titles in lobbying efforts on political matters.

This behavior raises concerns about potential misuse of influence associated with royal status.

Furthermore, allegations have surfaced regarding threatening letters sent by Meghan's legal representatives to an organization in Canada where she previously volunteered.

The letters purportedly cautioned against publishing an old story related to Meghan's volunteer work, suggesting that doing so could tarnish her reputation as an HRH member of the British royal family.

Critics contend that Meghan lacks the authority to assert her royal title in this manner, especially when employing implicit threats to suppress information.

Former British Army General Christopher Moussa has emerged as a vocal critic of Meghan's alleged actions, denouncing them as reprehensible and disgraceful.

With a distinguished military career spanning over four decades, General Moussa condemned what he perceives as oppressive and bullying behavior on Meghan's part.

He emphasized the detrimental impact of Meghan's actions on democratic principles, warning against setting a dangerous precedent through the misuse of royal titles.

General Moussa's scathing rebuke of Meghan's alleged conduct has resonated with many, underscoring the gravity of the situation.