Royal Expert Suggests Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Could Camp on Sandringham Estate

During a recent segment of This Morning, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle found themselves at the center of a light-hearted jest as royal expert Camilla Tominey playfully proposed the idea of them staying in a tent on the Sandringham estate.

The discussion arose following the news that plans have been approved for the introduction of glamping tents at Sandringham.

The new outdoor holiday initiative is set to include 28 caravan pitches, 12 camping spots, and 15 safari tents for those seeking a royal holiday experience.

In a humorous tone, Miss Tominey quipped that the tent accommodation could serve as a suitable option for Harry and Meghan should they decide to pay a visit.

She humorously remarked, “Oh my god, it doubles up as a place for Harry and Meghan to stay if they ever visit,” citing the couple's apparent fondness for safari experiences and outdoor adventures.

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams weighed in on the ongoing royal dynamics, suggesting that Harry's upcoming trip to the UK might pave the way for reconciliation within the royal family.

Acknowledging the complexities of the situation, Fitzwilliams expressed his belief that it would be more appropriate for Meghan to remain in the US on this occasion.

He emphasized the natural concern that arises for a son in such circumstances and highlighted the significance of King Charles' openness about his health struggles in fostering potential healing within the family.

However, not all commentary has been as forgiving towards Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Royal commentator Tom Bauer, speaking on Talk TV, emphasized the importance of not overlooking Harry's past actions and statements, particularly in light of Charles' health challenges.

Bauer pointed out the hurtful remarks Harry has made towards various members of the royal family, including his father, stepmother Camilla, and brother William and Kate.

Meghan Markle, too, faced criticism from royal pundit Quentin Letts, who expressed frustration with what he perceived as her tendency to engage in insincere and calculated public relations strategies.

Letts accused Markle of manipulating her public image and using press releases to further her own agenda.

In an article for the Daily Mail, Letts characterized Markle as someone who embraces California's culture of pseudo-psychological language and wears her anxieties as a badge of honor.

Letts did not hold back in his assessment, describing Markle as someone who seeks to portray herself as sensitive and humble while simultaneously pursuing ambitious career goals.

He warned against overlooking the negative impact of Markle's actions and words, even in the face of challenging family circumstances.

Letts concluded by urging readers to consider the true nature of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, emphasizing the need for a critical examination of their behavior and intentions.