Meghan Markle’s Grifting Exposed: Kimai Founders Disclose Her Freebie Requests

Meghan Markle's penchant for accepting freebies has once again come under scrutiny as the founders of Kimai, a female-founded jewellery business, revealed that she had requested and received £1,990 worth of diamond earrings from them during her time as a working member of the royal family in 2019.

The artificial diamond brand sent Meghan their Felicity earrings, valued at £995, which she donned during a visit to the charity Smartworks headquarters in London.

These earrings, adorned with 26 lab-grown diamonds totaling 0.24 carats, elegantly hug the ear's curve and feature three dangling diamonds that sway gracefully with movement.

Contrary to royal protocol, Meghan reportedly kept the freebies sent to her at Kensington Palace instead of returning them, as is customary.

Prince Harry's memoir even disclosed that she would distribute these gifts among her staff, although Palace employees did not receive any themselves.

This behavior raised eyebrows within royal circles, as accepting such gifts goes against established norms.

The audacity of Meghan's actions has left many questioning her sense of propriety and decorum.

Recently, Kimai's founders, Sydney Nehouse and Jessica Warch, made an appearance on Dragon's Den, where they proudly highlighted Meghan's endorsement of their designs.

Seeking a £250,000 investment for a 3% equity stake in their business, the founders shared that Meghan had agreed to promote their brand in exchange for receiving complimentary items.

This revelation sheds light on Meghan's desire to associate herself with luxury brands and her willingness to leverage her royal status for personal gain.

It seems that Meghan's inclination towards accepting freebies is deeply ingrained in her personality, with instances like the controversial acceptance of a bike for her son in Montecito, a gift that many believe was unnecessary given the family's means.

Such behavior has led to criticisms of Meghan's sense of entitlement and self-importance, with some suggesting that her actions reflect a lack of regard for established norms and protocols.

The incident involving Charles' 70th birthday party further underscores Meghan's questionable behavior, as witnesses recall her attempting to leave with a gift intended for the Prince, only to be intercepted by a vigilant staffer.

This episode, characterized by a lack of tact and grace, adds to the growing list of controversies surrounding Meghan's conduct while part of the royal family.

Her actions have sparked debates about privilege, entitlement, and the boundaries of acceptable behavior, especially for someone with her public profile.

As Meghan's royal days fade into the past, her history of grifting and seeking personal gain at the expense of propriety continues to resurface.

While some may attribute her actions to a desire for luxury or a sense of superiority, others view them as symptomatic of a deeper issue related to her character and values.

The ongoing scrutiny of Meghan's conduct serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges that come with navigating fame, wealth, and influence in the public eye.

In conclusion, Meghan's association with the Kimai founders and her acceptance of freebies have reignited discussions about ethics, responsibility, and the obligations that come with privilege.

Her actions, whether intentional or inadvertent, have consequences that extend beyond personal gain, shaping perceptions of her character and integrity.