Exclusive: Meghan Markle’s Controversial Move with Lilibet’s Name Sparks Outrage

A recent revelation has surfaced, indicating that Meghan Markle took steps to copyright the name Lilibet even before her pregnancy, allegedly capitalizing on the Queen's personal moniker for financial gain.

The disclosure has stirred controversy, with Meghan's spokesperson, Omid Scobie, suggesting that these actions may not be in the best interest of the late Queen Elizabeth.

Contrary to information previously shared by the palace in a jointly crafted biography back in 2022, these latest developments paint a different portrait of the monarch, one unfamiliar to the public eye.

Although Meghan and Harry claim to have received approval from the Queen to use the name Lilibet, they perceive the ongoing scrutiny as part of a relentless smear campaign targeting them.

Despite lacking concrete evidence of the Queen's endorsement, Scobie, known for his controversial statements in the past, has now shifted his focus to the late Queen's legacy.

According to reports, Queen Elizabeth expressed her discontent to palace aides, emphasizing that while she may not possess ownership of palaces or artworks, her name holds significant value, now seemingly appropriated by others.

The release of a new book, “Charles III, New King, New Court: The Inside Story” by Robert Hardman, delves into the Queen's alleged displeasure following Meghan and Harry's use of her private nickname.

Royal Insider Angela Levin, speaking to GB News, described the situation as distressing, highlighting Meghan's preemptive copyrighting of the name Lilibet before its actual use.

Levin expressed dismay over what she perceived as a disrespectful maneuver by the Sussexes, insinuating that it stemmed from Meghan's dissatisfaction with her treatment within the royal family.

The decision to register the domain lilibetdiana.com for potential merchandise sales before Lilibet's birth has been met with criticism, portraying Meghan's intentions in a negative light.

The move to profit from a name deeply cherished by the Queen and her family has been deemed distasteful and opportunistic.

Levin further condemned the act as a vindictive response from Meghan, driven by a desire to retaliate against perceived slights experienced during her time in the royal fold.

The narrative surrounding Meghan's actions has raised concerns about her motivations and priorities, particularly in light of exploiting personal connections to generate revenue.

The timing and manner in which Meghan pursued the trademarking of Lilibet's name have sparked outrage and cast a shadow over her intentions.

As the public becomes privy to these revelations, questions loom over Meghan's ethical compass and the implications of her business endeavors on the royal family's legacy.

The saga involving Meghan Markle and the contentious use of Lilibet's name serves as a cautionary tale, underscoring the complexities of intertwining personal relationships with commercial interests.

The fallout from these disclosures reverberates across social spheres, prompting reflections on integrity, respect, and the boundaries of propriety.

In a landscape where private matters intersect with public scrutiny, the repercussions of such actions extend beyond individual reputations to broader societal conversations on accountability and ethics.

As the dust settles on this latest chapter in the ongoing saga surrounding Meghan Markle, the ramifications of her decisions continue to unfold.

The clash between personal prerogatives and public perceptions underscores the delicate balance between individual agency and communal expectations.

In navigating the aftermath of these revelations, stakeholders are left to ponder the enduring impact of such controversies on the fabric of trust and authenticity in the public sphere.