Meghan Markle Shines in $12,000 Gold Ensemble at Women of Vision Gala

Meghan Markle exuded elegance and sophistication as she graced the stage in New York City to accept the prestigious Women of Vision award at a dazzling gala event.

The Duchess of Sussex spared no expense, captivating onlookers with her stunning $12,000 gold ensemble.

Despite arriving in a humble Hertz car rental area, Meghan radiated glamour in a custom $1,850 Colombian-designed gown sourced from the women-owned brand Joanna Ortiz.

Putting her own unique twist on the label's ideal universe midi-dress, Meghan opted to forego the original straps to showcase her radiant California glow.

In line with the evening's feminist theme, Meghan continued her golden allure by pairing her midi-dress, featuring a daring front slit, with chic gold strappy n^ked heels from Tom Ford.

The $1,350 sandals boasted a barely-there n^ked design with a distinctive key and padlock embellishment adorning the delicate ankle strap.

Complementing her ensemble, the duchess accessorized with a $1,100 Carolina Herrera Metropolitan Insignia clutch in a matching golden hue, adding a touch of sophistication to her overall look.

On social media, members of the Hashtag Sussex Squad have begun to express their concerns regarding the substantial expenses incurred by Meghan Markle for her attire, juxtaposed with charitable donations for Archie and Lilibet's birthdays.

Questions arise about the allocation of funds, especially as Meghan donned a dress worth up to $100,000 for a single evening.

Criticism is directed towards the financial operations of Meghan's entities, registered thousands of miles away in Delaware, allegedly allowing a significant portion of donations to be absorbed by expenses rather than charitable causes.

The Sussex Squad, a group dedicated to supporting Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, faces scrutiny for their fundraising efforts, with claims that Meghan prioritizes shopping over philanthropic endeavors.

Allegations suggest that the couple relies on orchestrated fundraising activities to maintain a positive public image, despite accusations of spreading misinformation and evading accountability.

Speculation mounts about the true intentions behind the Archewell foundation, with some questioning its integrity and financial transparency.

Doubts surrounding the allocation of donations intensify, with calls for greater accountability and transparency from the Archewell organization.

Suggestions emerge that potential discrepancies in fund distribution could be addressed through verification processes by platforms like GoFundMe, ensuring that contributions are utilized for their intended purposes.

Concerns grow over the substantial seed funding received by Archewell, juxtaposed with limited charitable disbursements, prompting calls for increased disclosure and financial accountability from the foundation.

As the narrative unfolds, observers await the forthcoming financial reports from Archewell, anticipating insights into the utilization of donations and the organization's overall financial health.

The discrepancy between initial funding and charitable outputs raises questions about the operational efficiency and impact of the foundation's initiatives.