Meg’s Non-Existent Child’s Bio Removed from Royal Website, Sparking Controversy

In a recent development, Meg's non-existent child's biography has been removed from the royal website, raising eyebrows and igniting a heated debate.

The decision was made by Palace Investigations, who also stripped Prince Harry of his HRH title on the family royal website.

Many view this as a petty move and are now calling for Buckingham Palace to exclude him from the line of succession altogether.

The royal website, in addition to removing the HRH title, has also reduced the description of Harry's wife, Meghan, to just four brief paragraphs.

Furthermore, changes have been made to Meghan's bio, specifically regarding her previous profession as an actress.

Previously, it stated that after university, Her Royal Highness worked as an actress.

However, it now reads that she simply worked as an actress after university.

Another alteration involves Meghan's involvement with a lifestyle magazine, which has been modified to state that she wrote and edited a lifestyle website instead.

Moreover, the positioning of Harry's landing page on the firm's site has been shifted lower, now falling between working members.

The pages of Harry and Meghan are now placed alongside those of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester and Princess Alexandra, further indicating a change in their status within the royal family.

Even Prince Andrew, who stepped back from his duties following a disastrous interview on Newsnight in November 2019, has seen his profile relegated to the bottom of the page.

Interestingly, their son Archie does not appear to have a link on the website.

However, a search for his name yields a few scant details, such as his name and gender.

Notably absent from the information is any mention of their daughter, Lilibet.

This omission highlights Buckingham Palace's strict policy of not allowing the public disclosure of children who are not born of the body, whether due to their nonexistence or the use of surrogates.

Recent reports suggest that MI6 has discovered peculiarities in Archie and Lilibet's paperwork, with claims that the children have been denied admission to public schools in Montecito.

These reports lend credibility to the rumors surrounding Meghan and Harry's alleged separation.

Journalist Kate Mansey believes that the changes made on the palace's website indicate that the couple may not be welcomed back into the royal fold.

She suggests that Harry, who frequently references his position in line to the throne, may be upset by his demotion.

Richard Eden, a diary editor, expressed his opinion on Buckingham Palace's decision to quietly remove Prince Harry's HRH title from the website profile page.

He believes that this action should go further, advocating for Harry's removal from the line of succession.

Eden argues that as one of the councillors of state who can stand in for the king, it is crucial to eliminate any possibility of him ascending to the throne.

In response to the backlash, Buckingham Palace stated that there are over 5,000 pages on the website that require periodic revision and updates.

They emphasized the need for these changes, particularly following the death of Queen Elizabeth II in September of last year.

However, sources close to the royals express fury at the continuous attacks launched by Harry and Meghan.

A deep-seated bitterness remains due to their memoir and various television interviews, causing tensions within the family to persist.

The removal of Meg's non-existent child's bio from the royal website has sparked a wave of controversy and speculation.