Lady C Exposes Meghan’s High Salary Payment to James Holt, Raising Questions About Sussex Money Sources

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's foray into Hollywood has been met with a series of setbacks, leading them to be labeled as one of the biggest losers of 2023.

As they struggle to establish themselves in the entertainment industry, critics are left wondering what the future holds for the royal rebels.

Royal expert Kinsey Schofield, speaking on GB News, suggests that when we think of Harry and Meghan, we envision them alongside Oprah Winfrey.

Schofield believes that the couple will continue to portray themselves as saints in an attempt to rehabilitate their image.

However, there are flaws in their approach, according to Schofield.

“The constant complaining, the glossy Netflix billboards,” Schofield explains.

“Their brands are simply not comparable, despite their claims of being Princess Diana 2.0.”

While the Sussexes often draw parallels to Harry's late mother, their actions seem to fall short of the mark.

In addition to their professional struggles, the Sussexes have also found ways to profit from their family drama.

One source of income comes from their involvement in charitable endeavors.

Recently, Meghan and Harry released a mission statement expressing their support for ethical journalism.

However, it seems that their mission may also involve silencing certain voices.

Furthermore, it has come to light that Archworld, the organization founded by the couple, allocates excessive salaries to its staff members.

Interestingly, the female directors receive significantly less money compared to their male counterparts.

A source reveals that James Holt, a key figure within the organization, was paid a remarkably high salary.

This increase in compensation, amounting to a staggering 277%, was allegedly aimed at helping Meghan and Harry conceal a significant sum of money obtained through questionable means.

According to Lady C, a prominent figure known for her insights into the royal family, the Sussexes may have funneled millions of dollars into Archworld under the guise of donations.

They then proceed to transfer these funds to a holding account, where they can earn interest under the names of account holders.

This strategy not only provides financial benefits but also allows them to claim tax breaks personally.

Lady C questions the legality and morality of this approach.

Lady C further points out discrepancies in Archworld's financial statements.

She highlights the lack of interest income on an $8 million balance, with a mere $4,141 credited as interest.

This raises concerns about potential money manipulation by Harry and Meghan.

Lady C emphasizes that any US charity allowing such a low return on capital would face severe criticism and be deemed derelict in its duty.

Lady C suggests that the majority, if not all, of the donations to Archworld come from the Markles themselves.

This arrangement enables them to enjoy personal tax benefits.

However, the funds are ultimately returned to Archworld at the end of the year.

While this may pass legal scrutiny for American charity funds, Lady C questions the ethics behind it.

Furthermore, Lady C raises concerns about Archworld's staffing and expenses.

She argues that the organization seems to be significantly overstaffed, given the projects cited.