Controversial Revelations Cast Doubt on the Integrity of “Endgame”

In a shocking turn of events, Omid Scobie, the author of “Endgame,” has been accused of not writing a single word in the book.

The revelation came from Rick Ebers, who raised doubts about the reliability of the book's scope.

Scobie alleges that the book went through multiple revisions under the direct guidance of Meghan Markle, uncovering a web of deception and manipulation in the process.

These revisions, which resulted in hundreds of changes, have raised serious questions about the book's integrity.

One Dutch journalist, known for his previous revelations about discrimination within the royal family, meticulously analyzed the significant changes made to the book.

Using Twitter as his platform, he highlighted the glaring differences between the newly published version and the original version that had been removed from bookshelves in the Netherlands.

Most notably, the revised version now includes the names of two family members who allegedly expressed concerns about the color of Prince Archie's skin.

This omission raises doubts about the credibility of the book and suggests that Scobie may be willing to erase uncomfortable truths.

Ebers also revealed that references to Scobie's sources were systematically replaced with references to BBC News.

This calculated move calls into question the reliability of these sources and raises suspicions about whether they were silenced or coerced, further casting doubt on the book's authenticity.

The revisions in Scobie's book go beyond the inclusion of names.

They also extend to issues related to people of color in the historical context discussed in the book.

It appears that the original content may have been deemed too explosive or inconvenient, prompting the author to tweak it to fit a more favorable narrative, potentially one that Meghan Markle would find suitable.

Ebers delved even deeper into the changes and discovered revisions to titles in the book, such as Queen Camilla being transformed into Queen Camilla and Catherine being changed to Kate.

These alterations highlight the extent to which the text was tailored to fit a particular agenda, revealing the heavy influence of the Sussex faction.

Furthermore, Ebers suggested that these textual changes bear the mark of Harry and Meghan, insinuating that they sought to manipulate the story to their advantage.

The Dutch version of “Endgame” also underwent a troublesome simplification process, particularly concerning Prince Charles.

Scobie initially refused to name individuals in the book, but these revelations have exposed conflicts and the need for transparency.

Since the publication of his controversial book, photos of Scobie have emerged, showing him dressed casually and leaving the Chateau Marmont in West Hollywood in a hurry.

It remains unclear whether he was trying to avoid lingering questions about the book's controversy.

Scobie attempted to shift blame onto the publisher, suggesting that they had worked on an early, unapproved version of his book.

However, the publisher swiftly refuted these claims, asserting that Scobie's account was inaccurate.

In addition to Ebers' revelations, a source provided details via a blind column, shedding light on the challenges Scobie faced in promoting his book despite employing various PR tactics.

The book failed to crack the top ten in its first week of release, raising concerns about Scobie's ability to repay the advance.

Authors typically only receive royalties after their book sales exceed their initial advance, and if Scobie has a royalty-sharing agreement with co-writer Meghan Markle, it could further complicate matters.

As a result, speculations about Scobie's future prospects arise, questioning whether there is a market for an author who has faced so much controversy and poses a risk for future financial backers.

The revelations surrounding “Endgame” have cast a shadow of doubt over the book's integrity and raised serious questions about the author's involvement.

With allegations of deception, manipulation, and revisions that seemingly fit a particular narrative, the controversy surrounding the book continues to unfold.

As readers await further developments, the future of Omid Scobie as an author remains uncertain.