Title: “The Controversial Revelations: Meghan Markle’s Alleged Use of Egg Freezing Services Raises Questions About Her Children’s Origins”

In a surprising turn of events, popular vlogger P. Dina from the YouTube channel “Royally Teachable Moments” has delved into the hidden secrets of the British royal family members.

However, what sets her latest video apart is the appearance of Thomas Markle, Meghan Markle's father, who discusses an intriguing topic: Meghan's alleged use of egg freezing services in the past.

This revelation has sparked a wave of questions regarding the true origins of Meghan and Prince Harry's children, Arch and Lilibet.

Strangely enough, the video was mysteriously deleted just half an hour after it was posted.

During the video, Thomas Markle confidently stated that he had firsthand knowledge of Meghan freezing her eggs and her plans to retrieve them.

Reading between the lines, he suggested that Meghan had opted for this procedure due to certain circumstances or personal preferences that prevented her from having children naturally.

Thomas further speculated that she had used the frozen eggs for Archie, as the timing coincided with her pregnancy.

Considering Meghan's dedication to her career in her twenties, it is unlikely that she would have interrupted her trajectory for motherhood, especially before her marriage to Prince Harry.

In fact, their relationship was so distant that Meghan even returned her wedding rings to him via mail.

The timeline of events adds credence to these claims.

Harry and Meghan's trip to Canada in November, followed by their announcement of Lilibet's pregnancy in February, aligns with rumors of a fertility clinic visit in Canada.

Additionally, Meghan's solo trip to Canada in August 2018 raises eyebrows, as Archie was born nine months later.

While some sources suggest it was merely a three-day visit to spend time with close friend Jessica Mulroney, who also served as her maid of honor during the royal wedding, others speculate that Meghan may have taken advantage of a special procedure at a private clinic in Canada.

The notion of Arch and Lilibet being “designer babies” carefully selected to possess specific traits desired by their parents, such as hair color, eye color, gender, and healthy genetics, is not far-fetched.

This aligns with previous discussions surrounding the children's characteristics.

Choosing a son as the firstborn would secure Harry's title as the male heir, which holds significant importance in aristocratic circles that historically favor male successors.

If by chance they had two girls, the Sussex title might not have passed on its own.

Meghan's deception not only interferes with the line of succession but also raises legal implications if she involved others in her plans after the fact.

To rectify this narrative, it is suggested that a third party must expose the alleged surrogacies, thereby allowing the royal family to distance themselves from any involvement.

The complexities and legalities surrounding this issue are immense, requiring careful navigation to safeguard the monarchy's reputation while adhering to the law.

Although it is widely believed that the royal family is aware of the anomalies and trickery, they must maintain an appearance of ignorance.

Meghan, however, seems convinced that she can outsmart an institution with a thousand-year-old history.

In conclusion, the recent revelations regarding Meghan Markle's alleged use of egg freezing services have ignited a firestorm of speculation about the true origins of her children, Arch and Lilibet.