Harry and Meghan Paid Convicted Hacker to Distort Charles and William’s Cash for Leaked Scandal

In a recent explosive incident, it has been revealed that Harry and Meghan collaborated with the Byline Times newspaper, resulting in misrepresentations about the British royal family.

However, experts have found these accusations lacking logic in their attempt to rewrite history.

The truth behind this scandal has now been brought to light, exposing the culprits involved.

The author of the hit piece against the royal family for Byline Times is none other than Dan Evans, a convicted hacker and disgraced journalist.

What makes this revelation even more intriguing is the fact that Evans is also part of Prince Harry's legal team in his case against tabloids.

This raises questions about the credibility of the article he co-authored.

Byline Times published an article titled “Explode and Megxit: How Dan Wooten and a Cash for Leaks Scandal Split the Monarchy,” which sheds light on what they claim King Charles did to push the Duke and Duchess of Sussex into commercial deals in the US.

Allegedly, this was done by withdrawing £700,000 funding for their trial year in Canada due to a royal cash for leaks scandal sparked by journalist Dan Wooten.

Byline Times further reveals that the financial sanctions were a result of the refusal to remove the name of a Kensington Palace aide from legal papers.

This aide's partner was allegedly receiving money from the executive editor of The Sun newspaper for stories about Megxit and Prince Archie.

Byline Times is publishing a three-part special investigating the dealings between Dan Wooten and the royal household.

They claim that Prince Harry and Meghan were forced out of the Sandringham Agreement, which allowed them to continue in public service from Canada, when Prince Charles decided to cut off their funding.

Furthermore, it was discovered that a partner of a key aide to Prince William received £4,000 from The Sun, allegedly for stories about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, during Wooten's tenure as executive editor.

However, there is evidence to refute these claims.

Dan Wooten himself confirmed on Twitter earlier this year that it was Prince Harry and Meghan who leaked information to him, not William and the palace.

He stated that Prince Harry's communications team briefed the media, including himself, throughout their time in the royal family, up until the Megxit story.

This contradicts the allegations made by Byline Times.

Additionally, the writer of the article, Dan Evans, is a convicted phone hacker who is now attacking Jason North and the royal family through his fiction.

It has been revealed that he was hired by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to twist and pervert the truth.

In a previous court case, it was highlighted that Harry's legal team had a close collaboration with convicted hackers Graham Johnson and Dan Evans, both of whom provided evidence on behalf of Harry.

The article by Byline Times starts with a blatant lie in its very first sentence.

Contrary to their claim, King Charles did not push Harry and Meghan into seeking commercial deals.

Official financial records from Clarence House show that Charles funded them even after their move to Canada.

It seems that Meghan had her own ambitions of stardom, dragging Harry along in the name of love.

It is worth noting that Meghan and Harry attempted to copyright “Sussex Royal” for their merchandise before they even left the royal family.

Their perpetual victimhood and shameless lies are evident.

The actions of Harry and Meghan have tarnished the image of the royal family, replacing the once-thought-of beautiful late Queen and her remarkable work.

It is clear that they need to be cut off, especially considering their established commercial deals and Meghan's disgraceful behavior.

Perhaps the late Queen foresaw the treachery of her ungrateful grandson and his gold-digging wife, leading her to make the decision to distance herself from them.