Shock as Yacht Girl Meg Accused of Connections with Prince Andrew Before Marrying Harry

In a startling revelation, it has been claimed that Meghan Markle may have had contact with Prince Andrew long before she met Prince Harry in 2016.

The allegation comes from Kirby Summers, the author of G. Slen Maxwell's unauthorized biography.

According to UK's The Steeple Times, a renowned journalist tipped them off about a possible connection between the now Duchess of Sussex and Prince Andrew through Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted pedophile.

Summers explored these connections in a recent podcast shared on YouTube, where she discussed Markle, her close friend Marcus Anderson, Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew.

Summers suggested that Markle's friend Anderson might have been a link to Epstein as early as 2001.

She also mentioned the possibility of finding a photo of Markle on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand, where she was seen socializing with Prince Andrew and Maxwell.

It should be noted that Markle's attendance at the Yacht Week 2016, an event described as “Sodom and Gomorrah at Sea” by GQ, remains unconfirmed.

Summers further claimed on Twitter that the Duchess of Sussex is under the influence of the same forces that controlled Jeffrey Epstein.

In other news, there are speculations that King Charles might decide to deny Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children their royal titles due to the ongoing rift.

According to tradition, as the children of the Sovereign's son, Archie and Lilibet should automatically be known as Prince and Princess, entitled to the styles of His Royal Highness and Her Royal Highness.

However, while the titles of William's children have been updated on the Royal Family's website, Archie and Lily's titles remain unchanged.

Katie Nicholl, Vanity Fair's Royal Correspondent, discussed this matter on Palace Confidential.

She stated that it would be interesting to see how King Charles handles the situation and whether he uses it as a conciliatory gesture to bring Harry and Meghan back into the fold.

Nicholl emphasized that trust is a crucial factor, and the couple's actions have strained the bond of trust.

Following the Queen's passing, Archie and Lilibet should have been allowed to use their new titles, but they are still listed as Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor and Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor in the official line of succession.

According to a rule established by King George V in 1917, the grandchildren of the sons of any sovereign in the direct male line, except for the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales, should enjoy the style and title of the children of Dukes.

However, whether Archie and Lilibet will receive the HRH titles now rests with King Charles, who has the authority to modify the rules.

Reports suggest that there have been behind-the-scenes arguments over this issue, with a source revealing Harry and Meghan's dissatisfaction with the apparent absence of titles.

The source explained that Harry and Meghan are concerned about security and believe that being Prince and Princess entitles them to a certain level of royal security.

They have been persistent in their demand for Archie and Lilibet to have the coveted royal titles.

However, they are not entitled to the HRH titles as they are no longer working royals.

Whether King Charles will grant their request remains uncertain, as access to the title is not automatic.

Previous monarchs, including Queen Elizabeth, have used a royal order known as Letters Patent to bestow different titles than those technically required.

King Charles now faces an unprecedented situation with Meghan and Harry, who stepped back from their royal duties in 2020 and relinquished their Royal Highness titles.

Meghan had previously claimed that her son's title was being questioned even before his birth.

The decision regarding Archie and Lilibet's titles will ultimately lie with the King, and it remains to be seen how he will address this delicate matter.