UK Parliament Strips Sussexes of Titles After Doctor Can’t Find Archie and Lily’s Info

The UK Parliament has taken action to strip Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, also known as the Sussexes, of their royal titles.

This decision comes after concerns were raised about the couple's use of their titles and the lack of information regarding their children, Archie and Lily.

The question now arises: do you agree with the Parliament's decision to remove both Harry and Meghan's titles, or should Meghan's title alone be revoked?

Since stepping down from their royal duties, Prince Harry and Meghan have faced calls from royal fans to have their titles removed.

One critic argues that the titles were given to them on the condition that they would serve the monarchy as working royals.

Since they are no longer fulfilling this role, it is believed that the titles should not be used for personal financial gain and should therefore be taken away.

Royal expert Marlene Koenig explains that the power to remove the titles lies solely with the Parliament.

The titles were given to Harry based on his succession of the Dukedom from his male line descendants.

The letter patent specifically mentions Harry, making it clear that only Parliament has the authority to strip him of his title.

In addition to the title controversy, there is also concern surrounding the lack of information about Archie and Lily's birth.

The Royal Doctor has stated that there is no information available about their births, raising questions about whether this information was lost by the hospital or if it simply does not exist.

Further investigation is being conducted to determine the truth.

During a recent session in the House of Lords, Labour Peer Stephen Benn questioned the logistics behind Harry's current status.

Given that he no longer fulfills full-time royal duties and now resides in the US, Benn suggests that it is time to consider amending the arrangement.

Liberal Democrat Peer Lord Addington supports this notion, emphasizing that working royals should be prioritized for royal duties.

In response to these concerns, Lord Privy Seal Lord Trew refrained from commenting on the specific circumstances.

However, he acknowledged that the royal household would need to have a say in any potential amendments.

He stated that the government will always consider necessary arrangements to ensure resilience in our constitutional system, as previous instances of accession have provided opportunities for such considerations.

Since Prince Harry and Meghan's departure from the royal family, questions have been raised about the continued use of their titles.

While they have already been stripped of their HRH titles and various other royal affiliations, an Act of Parliament is required to officially remove their titles.

Royal historian Madeleine Koenig argues that the focus should not solely be on removing the titles, but rather on how they are used.

She suggests that clarity should have been provided regarding the utilization of royal titles in business endeavors when the split between the Sussexes and the royal firm was confirmed.

Koenig proposes that Meghan and Harry refrain from using their titles professionally, suggesting alternative surnames such as Winsome or Mountbatten Winsor or simply using their last name, Sussex.

She believes that an Act of Parliament is unnecessary, and that this approach would be the best course of action for the couple.

In regards to the children, it is important to understand that genetic information is organized into genes, which determine various traits including hair color.

For Archie to have ginger hair, both Harry and Meghan would need to possess the ginger hair gene.

However, Meghan has dark hair, leading to doubts about Archie's potential hair color.

The controversy surrounding the Sussexes' titles and the lack of information about their children continues to generate debate.

As the UK Parliament takes action to address these concerns, the future remains uncertain for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.