Archwell’s Political Empowerment Program Partnership Announcement Removed

In a surprising turn of events, an announcement regarding Archwell's partnership with an organization to launch a political empowerment program in the United States was swiftly taken down on September 25th.

The news came shortly after Meghan's PR company revealed that the Archwell Foundation is expanding its advocacy for Afghan refugees through a new collaboration with Mina's List.

It is worth noting that the wording of the initial announcement was somewhat vague and misleading.

It seemed to imply that Archwell had directly assisted 11,000 refugees and made donations to four charities.

However, this interpretation is questionable, as even a small individual donation could technically be considered a partnership.

It is curious how the monetary contributions from Archwell are never explicitly disclosed, and their involvement often appears to be more collaborative than initiatory.

Coincidentally, shortly after the removal of the political project announcement with Mina's List, Archwell made another announcement regarding their contribution of feminine hygiene products to Gianko.

This timing conveniently diverted attention from the recent news about the alleged exploitation at a Harlem school.

One can't help but wonder if Meghan is using these strategic moves to pave the way for a return to her previous paid-for philanthropy PR endeavors.

However, it seems that Mina's List has denied any cooperation or contribution from Meghan and Archwell, leading to the deletion of the false announcement.

Similarly, the Gianko Foundation's website does not mention any involvement from Archwell.

It is interesting to observe that Archwell, despite lacking the necessary credentials and financial resources, continues to dabble in political and empowering initiatives.

Their tendency to rely on their titles and associations rather than their own capabilities is becoming increasingly evident.

Let us not forget the infamous incident where they purchased a Kerry Kennedy award for themselves.

While others paid exorbitant amounts, up to $1 million, for a table at the event, the Harkles arrived an hour late and hastily departed.

There was no opportunity for mingling with the affluent attendees.

It appears that Meghan is only interested in being photographed with famous individuals, disregarding those who may not possess high social status.

This behavior has undoubtedly played a significant role in her declining reputation, as it is never wise to be rude to the wealthy.

These recent developments follow the revelation by British Royal Family News that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, fresh off their Invictus Games PR campaign, have been cautioned about the realities of the real world.

Richard Fitzwilliams, writing for Express.co.uk, emphasized that the influential figures they aspire to associate with do not tolerate incompetence or failures.

Hollywood, in particular, cares little about titles but craves the scent of success, an attribute that the Markles seem to lack.

During the Invictus Games, the Sussexes transformed the event into their own personal red carpet affair.

Their photographer, Meesan Harriman, was present to capture every forced smile, blown kiss, and staged embrace from Meghan, turning them into glossy mementos.

However, one must question whether A-list celebrities truly care about Harry and Meghan's co-opting of an occasion meant to honor deserving servicemen and women.

Fitzwilliams accurately points out that the Markles are their own worst enemies, and Harry's image suffers due to his own actions.

The couple's behavior appears unpredictable, bitter, and untrustworthy.