Meghan Markle Sparks Controversy by Declining Pendant Donation from Vancouver Organization

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has found herself at the center of a heated debate after declining to wear a pendant donated by the Vancouver-based organization Justice for Girls (JFG).

The organization, which supports disadvantaged adolescent females, presented Markle with a golden diamond well pendant during her visit in January 2020.

However, during her most recent visit, she chose not to wear the custom-made necklace, raising questions about her commitment to feminist principles.

JFG, established in 1999 and recognized by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, commended Markle for her advocacy for girls and women's rights.

The pendant, donated by local jeweler Holly Bartlett and his teen pile tribe member, was intended as a symbolic gesture.

Yet, Markle's decision to opt for alternative jewelry has sparked speculation and drawn comparisons to a previous incident involving Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, wearing earrings presented by a bereaved mother on Mental Health Day.

Critics argue that Markle's apparent disregard for the pendant could be seen as offensive to the indigenous jeweler and the girls associated with JFG.

Furthermore, concerns have been raised about her potential disregard for the indigenous partners involved in the upcoming Invictus Games 2025.

Instead of showcasing her engagement jewelry, Markle opted for a pink diamond ring during her visit, leading detractors to question her understanding of the significance of locally procured or bestowed accessories.

This incident has fueled skepticism and allegations surrounding Markle's visits, with some suggesting that she uses them as mere photo opportunities rather than substantive engagements.

Critics point out that this approach diverges from the royal family's traditional practice of using fashion and accessories to foster diplomatic ties and communicate respect.

Markle's detractors also highlight her lack of permanent work in the United States, further casting doubt on her long-term commitment to organizations like JFG.

In a separate development, Meghan Markle has faced criticism regarding her alleged involvement in briefing Omid Scobie, an unofficial spokesperson for the couple.

Commentator Matthew Lass expressed concern about the impact of Markle's association with Scobie during an interview with GB News.

Lass described the situation as “an absolute mess” and questioned the wisdom of Markle briefing Scobie, suggesting that it may be perceived as a desperate move.

Lass also commented on the proliferation of royal biographies, stating that there is often a diminishing return with each new publication.

He alluded to Scobie's upcoming book, “Endgame,” which promises to provide a penetrating investigation into the current state of the British monarchy.

The book explores themes such as an unpopular king, a power-hungry heir to the throne, a queen willing to go to extreme lengths to preserve her image, and a prince forced to start a new life after being betrayed by his own family.

As the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact her public image and her relationship with the British monarchy.