Prince Harry’s Memoir: An Analysis of the Controversial Title

In a recent YouTube video, Jesús Enrique Rosas, also known as the Royal Rogue, delves into the upcoming memoir by Prince Harry, titled “Spare.”

Rosas questions the irony of using a term that has been considered derogatory to describe oneself.

He suggests that the choice of title may be an attempt to manipulate public opinion or test the waters before the book's release on January 10.

Rosas highlights the outrage expressed by anonymous palace aides, media pundits, and newspapers upon learning the title of the memoir.

He accuses them of playing the victim and claims that Megan, Prince Harry's wife, anticipated these reactions.

Rosas speculates that Prince Harry himself made the decision to name the book “Spare,” but questions the logic behind embracing a term he supposedly dislikes.

The Royal Rogue criticizes Prince Harry for not fully embracing the opportunities that came with being the spare heir.

Instead of taking on royal duties, Prince Harry chose to escape royal life and pursue a celebrity lifestyle in Hollywood.

Rosas suggests that this decision may not have worked out as expected, questioning whether Megan has been a good manager or if she values Prince Harry's fame.

Rosas also takes aim at Prince Andrew, suggesting that Prince Harry is trying to sink even lower than him in public opinion.

He questions the validity of Prince Harry's claims of being a scapegoat, arguing that one cannot be a scapegoat without having responsibilities.

The Royal Rogue expresses skepticism about the contents of the memoir, particularly Prince Harry's claim of offering “hard-won wisdom.”

He doubts the credibility of the ghostwriter and mocks the notion of Prince Harry having trademark cheekiness.

Rosas asserts that the book will not receive his support and vows not to spend a penny on it.

While acknowledging that the memoir will touch on Prince Harry's journey of being the spare heir and his decision to start a new life, Rosas questions the relevance of these aspects.

He dismisses claims that the book will shed light on Prince Harry's experiences in Afghanistan and his commitment to a lifetime of service, stating that these topics do not align with Prince Harry's actions.

Rosas concludes by expressing doubt about the impact of the memoir on the royal family and the institution.

He suggests that the risk of damage to reputations and relations may be exaggerated, given that no one has officially read the book.

He questions the authenticity of the sources cited by Omid Scobie, the author of the article Rosas analyzes.

In the end, Rosas acknowledges Prince Harry's right to tell his story but remains skeptical about the content and its potential impact.

He emphasizes the need for critical analysis and a discerning approach when consuming such memoirs.