Harry and Meghan’s Photos Raise Suspicion of Manipulation

In a recent episode, YouTuber Jesús Enrique Rosas, known as the Royal Rogue, questions the authenticity of the photos featuring Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Rosas suggests that the images may have been manipulated to create the illusion that the couple was together when they were not.

Rosas begins by discussing the importance of analyzing body language in such situations.

He emphasizes the need to allow time for the brain to process information and signals before drawing conclusions.

Upon reviewing the Daily Fail's original headline, which claimed that Harry and Meghan were holding hands, Rosas realizes that none of the pictures actually show them doing so.

This realization raises suspicion, especially considering the emphasis placed on the hand-holding in both the headline and the first paragraph of the article.

Rosas questions the credibility of these outlets and wonders why they would promote something that was not evident in the pictures.

He highlights the fact that there are only two photos where Harry and Meghan's bodies are visible, and in both cases, there is no physical contact between them.

To further support his argument, Rosas examines the angles from which the photos were taken.

He suggests that either there were two photographers capturing the scene from different perspectives or one photographer with ample time to move around and take pictures from various angles.

In either scenario, it seems unlikely that they would not capture a clear shot of the couple holding hands.

Rosas then introduces a mind tool he uses for body language analysis, encouraging viewers to think of shapes rather than people when examining photos.

He refers to a previous picture of Harry and Meghan at a concert, where their integration and physical contact are clearly visible.

In contrast, he points out that in the photos published by tabloids, there is no physical contact or overlap between their bodies.

The absence of any form of interaction between Harry and Meghan in the pictures raises doubts about their authenticity.

Rosas questions whether the photographers could not find the right angle or if the couple was even in the same place at the time.

He criticizes the chosen picture for publication, which conveniently hides Harry behind a bodyguard and lacks any visible hand-holding or overlap.

Rosas also highlights the photographer's affiliation with Meghan's camp and suggests a potential bias in the images.

He points out anomalies in the photos, such as the dark outline around Meghan's hat, which could indicate image manipulation.

Additionally, he notes that several pictures feature Harry hidden behind the SUV, with minimal variation in his expression.

Drawing on his expertise in Photoshop, Rosas demonstrates how easily images can be created and manipulated to appear real.

He warns that this issue could become a significant problem in the future.

As he concludes his analysis, Rosas questions the inclusion of a photo in the reel that does not even feature Harry.

In the comments section, Rosas invites his viewers to share their thoughts on the matter.

He expresses his gratitude for their support and encourages them to like and subscribe to his channel to keep him inspired to create more content.

As the debate surrounding the authenticity of these photos continues, it is essential to approach such images with a critical eye and consider the possibility of manipulation.