Must Read
Meghan Markle’s Baby Bump Sparks Controversy and Conspiracy Theories
A growing number of individuals are raising doubts about the authenticity of Meghan Markle's baby bump.
These skeptics are convinced that Markle used a moonbump product to feign pregnancy, potentially to conceal the couple's use of a surrogate.
Rumor has it that Oprah Winfrey, during her interview with the couple, discovered Meghan's moonbump and required everyone present to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
Although Oprah wanted to address the issue, Meghan insisted that it was not the right time.
According to sources, Royal Aid allegedly spotted the moonbumps on the ground at Frogmore Cottage and even on a bedroom floor.
Eyewitnesses claim that Meghan's bumps appeared to sway from side to side, deflate, and then quickly inflate, emitting an audible popping sound.
This unusual phenomenon was captured in a video where Meghan was seen greeting dogs during a royal visit.
It is worth noting that many women who utilize surrogates wear moonbumps to simulate the experience of being pregnant alongside their surrogate.
Could this explain why Meghan seemed unperturbed by her unconventional square-shaped bump or when her bump fell to her knees?
Furthermore, she allegedly left her bump behind at the hotel while attending a party with Marcus Anderson in New York City for her baby shower.
The footage of the moonbump is undeniably intriguing.
The distinct snap noise accompanied by a visibly inflating belly as Meghan stands up is rather convincing.
Additionally, other videos showcasing the peculiar waddle of the bump have raised eyebrows among viewers.
Meanwhile, Oprah Winfrey has faced criticism for her alleged misinterpretation and overreaction during the interview with Meghan and Harry.
This was particularly evident in her focus on Archie's skin color, despite Harry denying claims that he called the royals racist.
In a recent interview with ITV's Tom Bradby, Harry made a surprising verbal U-turn while promoting his controversial memoir.
He reiterated his denial of the racism accusations on Good Morning America.
During the interview, Bradby confronted Harry about his previous statement where he accused members of his family of racism.
However, the prince vehemently denied the accusation, claiming that it was the British press who had made those allegations.
When asked if Meghan ever mentioned the royal family's racism, Harry clarified that there were concerns expressed about Archie's skin color.
He went on to suggest that these comments were indicative of unconscious bias within the institution.
This sparked a semantic debate about the distinction between racism and unconscious bias.
Harry defended his position, stating that once unconscious bias is acknowledged, individuals or institutions have an opportunity to learn and grow from it.
However, if it remains unaddressed, it can evolve into racism.
This response left Bradby and other hosts astonished, as Harry's words seemed contradictory and conflicted.
They criticized him for allowing his family to be implicated in a racism scandal without correcting the narrative.
BBC royal correspondent Jenny Bond described Harry's apparent change of stance as “almost unforgivable.”
She highlighted the fact that although Harry did not explicitly use the term “racist,” he failed to rectify the narrative when the racism controversy erupted.
ITV News Royal Editor Chris Shipp echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that Harry accused the royal family of not correcting the narrative, yet he himself remained silent.
Online, Prince Harry faced further scrutiny and backlash for his remarks.
Critics pointed out that he stated his family was not racist and that the conversation about Archie's skin color was not about racism during the Oprah interview.
They argued that it was the British press, not the royal family, who were responsible for those accusations.