Meg Fuming as Soho Staff Post Harry a Large Bar Bill During His London Trip

Prince Harry's recent visit to the UK has caused quite a stir, with reports suggesting that he stayed at Frogmore Cottage, despite being evicted from the property.

However, according to a source from a Royal Insider, this information is false.

It seems that Harry was not allowed access to the palace during his personal trips, and neither King Charles nor Prince William met him during his stay.

When Harry arrived in the UK, King Charles was still on a visit to Romania, only returning on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, the King was occupied with a military event at Buckingham Palace on Wednesday.

These details align perfectly with a report on Twitter, which claims that Harry left behind a hefty bill at Soho House, along with some serious damage.

The receipts were even shared by the staff on Twitter, but were later deleted.

It appears that Harry's stay at Frogmore Cottage was far from glamorous.

Located 40 minutes away from London, the cottage offered no room service or any other amenities.

In fact, it was described as empty and lonely.

Despite this, Harry chose to fly over on Sunday night, potentially missing a court appearance scheduled for Monday.

Instead, he was seen partying at Soho House, and his condition on Monday suggested that he was worse for wear.

Despite being advised against attending court, Harry's sense of entitlement and privileged upbringing led him to believe he could outsmart Barrister Andrew Green.

However, Green is known as “The Beast” among his peers, a formidable cross-examiner who is not to be taken lightly.

Fellow barristers have warned that Harry's arguments may not hold up under Green's scrutiny, and he may be exposed as an unreliable historian.

It seems that Harry's lack of preparation and understanding of the legal process may work against him.

When asked by the judge if he had evidence of hacking, Harry replied that he was there to find out.

This response only highlights his lack of understanding and raises questions about his decision to bring the case in the first place.

The burden of proof lies entirely with him, and the Mirror Group, whom he is suing, need not prove anything.

In contrast to his ill-fated TV interview with Emily Maitlis regarding his links to Jeffrey Epstein, Harry seems to have underestimated the challenges he faces in court.

Barrister Andrew Green is expected to be a hundred times tougher than Maitlis, and his cross-examination will likely expose the flaws in Harry's arguments.

While Harry may believe he is on friendly terms with Green, he may soon realize that he has underestimated his opponent.

As the case unfolds, it remains to be seen whether Harry's arrogance and belief in his own invincibility will work in his favor.

The repercussions of his actions may extend beyond the courtroom, as his reputation as a reliable historian and trustworthy individual could be called into question.

Only time will tell how this legal battle will play out for Prince Harry and the Mirror Group.