Title: Controversy Surrounding Meghan Markle’s Children and Their Line of Succession

In an unexpected turn of events, a hidden status line allegedly related to Meghan Markle has surfaced on Reddit, catching the attention of the King and his assistant.

The status line contains a controversial statement that calls for the removal of the non-existent Sussex children from the line of succession until their proper documentation is presented.

The claim suggests that Meghan had an epidural prior to delivery, which contradicts the notion that she is paralyzed from the waist down.

However, it is important to note that each patient's experience may vary, and in Meghan's case, the epidural provided relief from labor pain without causing paralysis.

Adding fuel to the fire, Thomas Markle, Meghan's father, has now come forward claiming that she had a hysterectomy at Queen's Hospital back in 2016.

This raises questions about the legitimacy of Meghan's children being in the line of succession if they were born through surrogacy.

According to the succession to the crown, children in the line of succession must be born of the body of royal members or through a spouse endangered by the seed of a person of royal blood.

This aligns with the common law, which states that the child must be carried by Meghan herself to be eligible for the line of succession.

The implications of this controversy are significant, as it directly affects Archie's royal titles.

If Meghan was never pregnant, her two children cannot be included in the line of succession.

Furthermore, doubts have been raised about the birth of Archie, with discrepancies in the doctors' involvement, timeline, and lack of witnesses to Meghan giving birth.

Speculations have also arisen regarding a possible surrogate mother turning up at Montecito Manor, demanding to see Archie.

Additionally, there are reports of Meghan's baby bump changing size and even disappearing altogether in various photographs.

Furthermore, a particular film showing Meghan heavily pregnant and squatting with her knees together has raised eyebrows, as medical experts argue that this is physically impossible for any woman to do in high heels or flats.

Interestingly, historical precedence exists for disputes regarding succession.

In 2016, the Privy Council addressed a contested Scottish vagrancy case where DNA evidence played a crucial role in denying the adult son of the 10th baronet his right to succeed.

The evidence revealed that his father, a distinguished royal marine general, was not his legitimate heir to the 8th baronet.

This ruling shattered the perceived beneficiary's rights and the long-established expectations of his family.

On a lighter note, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, recently disclosed his son Archie's aspirations for the future.

In his new documentary, “Heart of Invictus,” released on Netflix, Prince Harry shares that Archie dreams of becoming an astronaut or a pilot.

However, he emphasizes that regardless of his chosen path, it is his character that matters most.

Prince Harry expresses his pride in seeing his son grow into a person of strong character, which would make both him and Meghan immensely proud.

As the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle's children and their line of succession continues to unfold, the King faces a significant decision regarding Archie's title.

The intricacies surrounding the birth of Meghan's children and the potential implications for their royal status have sparked intense debate and speculation.

While the truth remains elusive, the world eagerly awaits further developments in this captivating saga.