Suspicions Surround Harry and Meghan’s Parenting as Questions Arise Over the Existence of Their Children

In recent times, doubts have emerged regarding the presence of children in Harry and Meghan's marriage.

Many people are questioning whether a loving and caring father like Harry would leave his children for extended periods and check into the San Vincente bungalows, a private members club in Los Angeles near his gym class at Barry's Boot Camp.

The existence of Archie and Lilibet has become a mystery, with some believing that Archie was born via a surrogate and Lilibet may not even exist.

Shockingly, there are claims that both children were borrowed from someone else.

Recently, a Reddit user named QuietVanilla revealed their findings after delving into Doria and Meghan's IMDB pages.

They discovered that there is no mention of Archie, only Lilibet, who is listed as the second-born.

Furthermore, there has been a scarcity of recent photos featuring Archie, with only one image of him as a six or seven-year-old being circulated.

This raises questions about the authenticity of the claims that Meghan and Harry have children.

Additionally, it is worth noting that Harry seems to be nowhere near any children at the moment, while Meghan resides in the San Ysidro Ranch Hotel and Harry in another hotel or townhouse.

Critics argue that the couple's lack of effort in maintaining the illusion of their children's existence is evident.

They point out that the charade began with a fake pregnancy in England, which was further perpetuated during Meghan's interview with Oprah.

The absence of concrete evidence of the children's existence, apart from manipulated photographs, adds fuel to the speculation.

Notably, there has been no public display of affection or interaction between the British royal family and these alleged offspring, particularly during significant events such as their christening.

Skeptics have even gone as far as suggesting that Meghan was seen with what appeared to be a doll, drawing comparisons to the fictional character Delta Dawn.

These doubts are compounded by Meghan's reputation for seeking attention and her desire to constantly remain in the news, regardless of the nature of the coverage.

If indeed there are children in their marriage, it is expected that Meghan would eagerly showcase them, documenting every aspect of their lives and positioning herself as an exemplary mother.

She would likely write books on parenting, emphasizing her expertise in raising multilingual children by the age of four.

Naturally, she would also monetize this venture by endorsing children's products and offering exclusive video content for a subscription fee.

However, the reality is quite different.

Meghan has failed to provide any substantial proof of her children's existence or actively engage in motherhood-related activities.

This has led many to question the authenticity of her claims.

It is high time for King Charles to address these concerns and put an end to what may be remembered as one of the biggest royal scams in history.

Adding to the intrigue, previous reports have indicated that Prince George's nickname was Archie, long before Archie Harrison was born.

George is affectionately known as PG Tips, a reference to the popular British tea brand, as well as Georgie within his family circle.

Interestingly, Meghan and Harry chose to name their newborn Archie Harrison in May 2019, five months after George's nickname had been widely reported.

The connection between the two incidents has sparked speculation that Kate and William might have felt slighted by Harry's use of their son's nickname for his own child.

As the debate continues, the public eagerly awaits clarification from the royal family regarding the truth behind Harry and Meghan's alleged children.